Reformat without Template:Cite web
Would it be possible to reformat this template more along the lines of Template:CIC1983, without removing any of the options this one has, so as to eliminate those pesky quotation marks around every citation? Not a big deal, but if someone who knows how could do this, it would make this much more aesthetically pleasing. Deus vult (aliquid)! Crusadestudent ( talk) 06:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Also, being able to wikilink the "CCC" part to
Catechism of the Catholic Church and hyperlink the rest to
vatican.va, which
Template:CIC1983 is able to do, would also be a plus. Deus vult (aliquid)!
Crusadestudent (
talk)
06:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry to revert your edits. The main reason was the output formatting had errors. Also, I had written this to match the most consistently used formatting found in the article, and think that the paragraph symbol might cause issues for some users. I do not think that it would be useful to pipe the CCC, ### to the catechism article, (I do not favor putting wikilinks to different articles in close proximity), but this might be easily done for the long version. -- Zfish118⋉ talk 20:28, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
In the second line of the documentation, we see this: <ref>{{CCC|paragraph_number|date_accessed}}<ref>. The final ref is missing a closing /. -- BrianCUA ( talk) 18:45, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Reformat without Template:Cite web
Would it be possible to reformat this template more along the lines of Template:CIC1983, without removing any of the options this one has, so as to eliminate those pesky quotation marks around every citation? Not a big deal, but if someone who knows how could do this, it would make this much more aesthetically pleasing. Deus vult (aliquid)! Crusadestudent ( talk) 06:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Also, being able to wikilink the "CCC" part to
Catechism of the Catholic Church and hyperlink the rest to
vatican.va, which
Template:CIC1983 is able to do, would also be a plus. Deus vult (aliquid)!
Crusadestudent (
talk)
06:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry to revert your edits. The main reason was the output formatting had errors. Also, I had written this to match the most consistently used formatting found in the article, and think that the paragraph symbol might cause issues for some users. I do not think that it would be useful to pipe the CCC, ### to the catechism article, (I do not favor putting wikilinks to different articles in close proximity), but this might be easily done for the long version. -- Zfish118⋉ talk 20:28, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
In the second line of the documentation, we see this: <ref>{{CCC|paragraph_number|date_accessed}}<ref>. The final ref is missing a closing /. -- BrianCUA ( talk) 18:45, 8 March 2018 (UTC)