This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Portals browsebar template. |
|
Archives: 1 |
![]() |
Portals ![]() | |||||||||
|
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2006 April 11. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
First of all, the links in this browse bar should take you to nine (9) separate portal lists or portal menus rather than portals, themselves.
This bar is supposed to be a navigational aid. What it currently is saying is that if your portal is not a top level portal, fat chance the public will ever see it.
Second? There is no second. This bar as it now is being implemented is a navigational aid that totally breaks down at the the second level. -- John Gohde ( talk) 12:17, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
I made the switch to Portal:Portals section links. Let the wrangling begin! ;-) RichardF ( talk) 21:03, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Based on the discussion above, I tried to fit the sections to the main page. This is what it looks like so far: Wikipedia:Main page alternative (portals). The Transhumanist 08:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Personally, I do not see why one editor who apparently can not make up his mind about anything is allowed to mess up the look of the portal that I have worked so hard to create. My portal is not under construction. It is being viewed by the public. No problem. I have changed the portal so that it will stick to the browsebar that I had selected and worked so hard to get. -- John Gohde ( talk) 15:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Neither does RichardF own the browsebar. Please bring back the browsebar as it was intended to be. -- 67.62.69.162 ( talk) 19:12, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks to Quiddity for bringing back the browsebar as it was intended to be. I saw no consensus reached for making any major changes to this bar. -- John Gohde ( talk) 15:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Removed the word/link "portals" from the beginning of the browsebar, since all the links on the browsebar already lead to that very same page. The whole page is covered, by links to all of its subsections. The Transhumanist ( talk) 19:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
don't you guys think that the given below format would give a nice look. Sushant gupta ( talk) 12:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Culture · Geography · Health · History · Mathematics · Nature · Philosophy · Society · Technology |
The result of the move request was: moved, simply to get it out of the RM backlog. And seriously, stop with these template RMs – moving them adds absolutely no value to the encyclopedia and RM is backlogged enough as is. Jenks24 ( talk) 07:15, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Browsebar →
Template:Portals browsebar – To indicate the browsebar's content.
Sardanaphalus (
talk)
10:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.Per
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Portals/Design#Random_portal_link. The link would be [[Special:RandomInCategory/All portals|Random portal]]
, which would look like this:
Random portal. -
Evad37 [
talk
14:06, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On 13 November 2019, Portal:Contents/Portals was moved to Wikipedia:Contents/Portals per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Contents#Requested move 9 October 2019. I propose that the links in this template should also be changed to the "Wikipedia:" link. I don't believe this would be a controversial change; I just can't do it myself. Greatedits1 ( I hope so | If not, let me know) 02:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Portals browsebar template. |
|
Archives: 1 |
![]() |
Portals ![]() | |||||||||
|
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2006 April 11. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
First of all, the links in this browse bar should take you to nine (9) separate portal lists or portal menus rather than portals, themselves.
This bar is supposed to be a navigational aid. What it currently is saying is that if your portal is not a top level portal, fat chance the public will ever see it.
Second? There is no second. This bar as it now is being implemented is a navigational aid that totally breaks down at the the second level. -- John Gohde ( talk) 12:17, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
I made the switch to Portal:Portals section links. Let the wrangling begin! ;-) RichardF ( talk) 21:03, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Based on the discussion above, I tried to fit the sections to the main page. This is what it looks like so far: Wikipedia:Main page alternative (portals). The Transhumanist 08:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Personally, I do not see why one editor who apparently can not make up his mind about anything is allowed to mess up the look of the portal that I have worked so hard to create. My portal is not under construction. It is being viewed by the public. No problem. I have changed the portal so that it will stick to the browsebar that I had selected and worked so hard to get. -- John Gohde ( talk) 15:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Neither does RichardF own the browsebar. Please bring back the browsebar as it was intended to be. -- 67.62.69.162 ( talk) 19:12, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks to Quiddity for bringing back the browsebar as it was intended to be. I saw no consensus reached for making any major changes to this bar. -- John Gohde ( talk) 15:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Removed the word/link "portals" from the beginning of the browsebar, since all the links on the browsebar already lead to that very same page. The whole page is covered, by links to all of its subsections. The Transhumanist ( talk) 19:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
don't you guys think that the given below format would give a nice look. Sushant gupta ( talk) 12:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Culture · Geography · Health · History · Mathematics · Nature · Philosophy · Society · Technology |
The result of the move request was: moved, simply to get it out of the RM backlog. And seriously, stop with these template RMs – moving them adds absolutely no value to the encyclopedia and RM is backlogged enough as is. Jenks24 ( talk) 07:15, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Browsebar →
Template:Portals browsebar – To indicate the browsebar's content.
Sardanaphalus (
talk)
10:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's policy on article titles.Per
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Portals/Design#Random_portal_link. The link would be [[Special:RandomInCategory/All portals|Random portal]]
, which would look like this:
Random portal. -
Evad37 [
talk
14:06, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
On 13 November 2019, Portal:Contents/Portals was moved to Wikipedia:Contents/Portals per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Contents#Requested move 9 October 2019. I propose that the links in this template should also be changed to the "Wikipedia:" link. I don't believe this would be a controversial change; I just can't do it myself. Greatedits1 ( I hope so | If not, let me know) 02:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)