 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Should I add the Lightning II to the template? Not too sure, as it still isn't definate if it is being selected (Due to source code dispites, and whatever else), and input (other than money) was very limited from the UK. King nothing 21:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Helicopters ? MilborneOne 20:46, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Should Transport Aircraft be listed here ? (Blackburn Beverley etc) Tkeator 00:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Am wondering whether or not the aircraft should be ordered chronologically within their groups...? Sardanaphalus ( talk) 01:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- LOL I came here to say that too, although I would say alphabetical is still best, but a chronological alternative would be very very helpful. Perhaps instead of a template have a table??? Ryan4314 ( talk) 01:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Should I add the Lightning II to the template? Not too sure, as it still isn't definate if it is being selected (Due to source code dispites, and whatever else), and input (other than money) was very limited from the UK. King nothing 21:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Helicopters ? MilborneOne 20:46, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Should Transport Aircraft be listed here ? (Blackburn Beverley etc) Tkeator 00:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Am wondering whether or not the aircraft should be ordered chronologically within their groups...? Sardanaphalus ( talk) 01:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- LOL I came here to say that too, although I would say alphabetical is still best, but a chronological alternative would be very very helpful. Perhaps instead of a template have a table??? Ryan4314 ( talk) 01:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)