![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
I've modified the list to include the historic boroughs, divided into east and west, as they are very much alive and well in the minds of Berliners as geographic designations; the east and west designations may be of use as they were the districts during the division of Berlin. I also alphabetized all the listings. One thing I was thinking of was adding dates to new districts created after 1920, such as Hohenschönhausen (1986). I haven't done this yet, but it's an idea. ProhibitOnions 20:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
The old template is outdated since 17 years in terms of East/West division. The old template is outdated since 5 years after administration reform. It is a waste of space and factual wrong. Please support new standard.( Sashandre 12:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)) all the best
Historical interest yes. Contemporary no. Thats why {tl|Roman provinces 120 AD}} don´t exist on main page of Rome. Same on Berlin-page and every other city-page. Only political entities are mentioned here and neighbourhoods.( Sashandre 13:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC))
I absolutely agree to the relevance of east/west but the political Boroughs have to be the foremost. How about the new template? ( Sashandre 13:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC))
I´m fine with this one now. The template has to be implemented in a new template-name and all Locality-Articles.( Sashandre 14:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC))
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
I've modified the list to include the historic boroughs, divided into east and west, as they are very much alive and well in the minds of Berliners as geographic designations; the east and west designations may be of use as they were the districts during the division of Berlin. I also alphabetized all the listings. One thing I was thinking of was adding dates to new districts created after 1920, such as Hohenschönhausen (1986). I haven't done this yet, but it's an idea. ProhibitOnions 20:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
The old template is outdated since 17 years in terms of East/West division. The old template is outdated since 5 years after administration reform. It is a waste of space and factual wrong. Please support new standard.( Sashandre 12:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)) all the best
Historical interest yes. Contemporary no. Thats why {tl|Roman provinces 120 AD}} don´t exist on main page of Rome. Same on Berlin-page and every other city-page. Only political entities are mentioned here and neighbourhoods.( Sashandre 13:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC))
I absolutely agree to the relevance of east/west but the political Boroughs have to be the foremost. How about the new template? ( Sashandre 13:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC))
I´m fine with this one now. The template has to be implemented in a new template-name and all Locality-Articles.( Sashandre 14:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC))