This template was considered for deletion on 2018 July 8. The result of the discussion was "withdrawn". |
Council | ||||
|
How about inserting the comments as suggested by the banner meta itself, i.e. as follows:
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no> | b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no> | b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no> | b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no> | b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> | b6 <!--Accessibility --> = <yes/no>
Comments could also be optional, activated by a template parameter. GregorB ( talk) 10:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Template was always substituted and is no longer needed. So replaced with a bolding template. — BrandonALF (talk) (Please ping me) 01:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
{{
B}}
has nothing to do with boldfacing. I've restored the proper template code and documentation. Wikipedia does not have templates as wrappers for basic HTML elements that are re-implemented in '''wikimarkup'''
; attempts to create them have repeatedly been deleted at
WP:TFD; even {{
span}}
and {{
div}}
were deleted. We only have template wrappers for non-wikimarkup elements, and mostly only those used in
semantic markup: {{
em}}
, {{
strong}}
, {{
code}}
, {{
var}}
, {{
kbd}}
, {{
samp}}
. PS: The fact that {{
B}}
is intended to be substituted is irrelevant. Many templates are, and will even throw an error if you don't do it. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼 05:44, 8 July 2018 (UTC)This template was considered for deletion on 2018 July 8. The result of the discussion was "withdrawn". |
Council | ||||
|
How about inserting the comments as suggested by the banner meta itself, i.e. as follows:
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no> | b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no> | b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no> | b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no> | b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> | b6 <!--Accessibility --> = <yes/no>
Comments could also be optional, activated by a template parameter. GregorB ( talk) 10:51, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Template was always substituted and is no longer needed. So replaced with a bolding template. — BrandonALF (talk) (Please ping me) 01:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
{{
B}}
has nothing to do with boldfacing. I've restored the proper template code and documentation. Wikipedia does not have templates as wrappers for basic HTML elements that are re-implemented in '''wikimarkup'''
; attempts to create them have repeatedly been deleted at
WP:TFD; even {{
span}}
and {{
div}}
were deleted. We only have template wrappers for non-wikimarkup elements, and mostly only those used in
semantic markup: {{
em}}
, {{
strong}}
, {{
code}}
, {{
var}}
, {{
kbd}}
, {{
samp}}
. PS: The fact that {{
B}}
is intended to be substituted is irrelevant. Many templates are, and will even throw an error if you don't do it. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ 😼 05:44, 8 July 2018 (UTC)