 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
@ Underlying lk: could you verify if Gastern looks ok? The two cites have multiple references but only one super-script number each. -- Green C 13:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- There was an issue in the template itself, it should be fixed now.--
eh bien mon prince (
talk)
19:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ok great. BTW I am using the bot to test new features with the BotWikiAwk framework on Toolforge, so am doing short runs of 50-200 articles - the bot itself is unchanged only the bot's controller. It could finish in 30 minutes if you want but otherwise over the next few days. Should be done soon but I keep finding new things to improve :) -- Green C 00:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
@ Underlying lk: bot is done. -- Green C 20:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Great, thanks.-- eh bien mon prince ( talk) 00:57, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
@ Underlying lk: could you verify if Gastern looks ok? The two cites have multiple references but only one super-script number each. -- Green C 13:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- There was an issue in the template itself, it should be fixed now.--
eh bien mon prince (
talk)
19:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ok great. BTW I am using the bot to test new features with the BotWikiAwk framework on Toolforge, so am doing short runs of 50-200 articles - the bot itself is unchanged only the bot's controller. It could finish in 30 minutes if you want but otherwise over the next few days. Should be done soon but I keep finding new things to improve :) -- Green C 00:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
@ Underlying lk: bot is done. -- Green C 20:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Great, thanks.-- eh bien mon prince ( talk) 00:57, 27 March 2019 (UTC)