![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
A thought: instead of the links at the bottom, articles for each of the ABC's various divisions could be created and put there instead ( News & Current Affairs and Television already exist, and there is room for Radio as well. There are some that probably wouldn't have enough information available - here are a few that could be included possibly, from [1].
timgraham 12:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
In light of the recent changes/improvements I've made to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and History of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation article's I think it might be a good idea to make some changes to how the navigation around ABC articles works.
Firstly, I'd make this template a somwhat smaller one providing broader links to articles on the ABC's various divisions are history. This template makes out that a lot of sections or departments of the ABC are actually divisions - there's a bit of a difference. This one has links to each of the actual divisions except for the 'communications' one (which is of relatively little signifigance) giving room for expansion on each one:
For articles relating to television I have this - it deals with things to do with the Television division..
For the articles on radio networks there's this, base around the Radio and Regional Content divison:
..and for Local Radio, there's this. There are a lot of red links, but I think a template like this is neccessary since there are a large number of local radio articles:
And finally, for the international services I've trimmed down the name of the International, Corporate Governance and Stategy to just ABC International (since that's all it relates to) and shifted the Australia Network/Radio Australia there:
The whole idea of this is so that it's more accurate - as it is now the template has the ABC's divisional structure completely wrong [2].. If anyone has objections it'd be nice if they could mention them sooner rather than later since this will no doubt take a while and I'd like to get under way. timgraham 04:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
timgraham 06:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
A thought: instead of the links at the bottom, articles for each of the ABC's various divisions could be created and put there instead ( News & Current Affairs and Television already exist, and there is room for Radio as well. There are some that probably wouldn't have enough information available - here are a few that could be included possibly, from [1].
timgraham 12:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
In light of the recent changes/improvements I've made to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and History of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation article's I think it might be a good idea to make some changes to how the navigation around ABC articles works.
Firstly, I'd make this template a somwhat smaller one providing broader links to articles on the ABC's various divisions are history. This template makes out that a lot of sections or departments of the ABC are actually divisions - there's a bit of a difference. This one has links to each of the actual divisions except for the 'communications' one (which is of relatively little signifigance) giving room for expansion on each one:
For articles relating to television I have this - it deals with things to do with the Television division..
For the articles on radio networks there's this, base around the Radio and Regional Content divison:
..and for Local Radio, there's this. There are a lot of red links, but I think a template like this is neccessary since there are a large number of local radio articles:
And finally, for the international services I've trimmed down the name of the International, Corporate Governance and Stategy to just ABC International (since that's all it relates to) and shifted the Australia Network/Radio Australia there:
The whole idea of this is so that it's more accurate - as it is now the template has the ABC's divisional structure completely wrong [2].. If anyone has objections it'd be nice if they could mention them sooner rather than later since this will no doubt take a while and I'd like to get under way. timgraham 04:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
timgraham 06:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)