 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This is a very useful sidebar, but it's a bit of a big lump to fit into some pages. Any chance we could consider using Template:Sidebar with collapsible lists to allow presentation in accordion-style lists and save a bit of space on smaller articles? Cnbrb ( talk) 13:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi The photo on the template is this one, yet if one clicks on the image it redirects to this one. Why would we want that? And what is the logic of displaying an image that if it arouses the reader's curiosity as to what it represents and the reader clicks on it for more inofrmation, it takes the reader to a different picture? Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 21:27, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hi - your links got a bit confused there. I think you meant to say that photo on the template is this one. When you click on it, it does not redirect - it is a link to the Canterbury Cathedral article rather than to the image file. I don't see a problem with this - it's quite legitimate for a photo of Canterbury Cathedral to link to an article about it. Cnbrb ( talk) 00:40, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
I may be missing something, but I can see no reason why this template should be in this category and so have removed it. Dunarc ( talk) 18:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This is a very useful sidebar, but it's a bit of a big lump to fit into some pages. Any chance we could consider using Template:Sidebar with collapsible lists to allow presentation in accordion-style lists and save a bit of space on smaller articles? Cnbrb ( talk) 13:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi The photo on the template is this one, yet if one clicks on the image it redirects to this one. Why would we want that? And what is the logic of displaying an image that if it arouses the reader's curiosity as to what it represents and the reader clicks on it for more inofrmation, it takes the reader to a different picture? Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 21:27, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hi - your links got a bit confused there. I think you meant to say that photo on the template is this one. When you click on it, it does not redirect - it is a link to the Canterbury Cathedral article rather than to the image file. I don't see a problem with this - it's quite legitimate for a photo of Canterbury Cathedral to link to an article about it. Cnbrb ( talk) 00:40, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
I may be missing something, but I can see no reason why this template should be in this category and so have removed it. Dunarc ( talk) 18:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)