![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Shouldn't the SKU order in the table be reversed, with the highest end SKU's (Ryzen 7 Mobile) being listed on top like any other semiconductor chip page? (tried to do it myself, but it didn't seem to work, also I wasn't able to swap the citations in my edit as I couldn't figure out how).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooe ( talk • contribs)
This is a table of Mobile Ryzen products. Desktop devices have no place in it. 49.145.138.74 ( talk) 16:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
It would be nice if we could keep these new tables (this here + this one) in sync, with the existing APU tables (see AMD APUs). There is some new stuff like caches and XFR, but other stuff should stay the same IMHO. Thats why I removed the target segment column. Minor stuff: Order of TDP/Memory support, Released vs Release Date, Missing MHz. And why is this table sortable? PS: Also the sorting in the other tables the most powerful processor is on the bottom here it is the other way around... Cheers Wikiinger ( talk) 15:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Matthew Anthony Smith: In response to your latest edit, what's the distinction between "Vega" and "RX Vega"? You only updated one row in the table but not others. -- intgr [talk] 14:15, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
←Interesting that in the Embedded section of the Ryzen article the V1202B is shown as having an RX Vega 3 integrated GPU. This seems like an inconsistency to me. Furthermore, the AMD slide mentioned above specifically refers to desktop Raven Ridge APUs, all of which are shown as having RX Vega n (n is either 8 or 11) integrated GPUs in their template. 83.104.249.240 ( talk) 13:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
AMD just announced the Athlon Silver 3050U and Athlon Gold 3150U 14 nanometer parts. Could someone add them to this template? I'm not good with tables. -- Veikk0.ma 07:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Shouldn't the SKU order in the table be reversed, with the highest end SKU's (Ryzen 7 Mobile) being listed on top like any other semiconductor chip page? (tried to do it myself, but it didn't seem to work, also I wasn't able to swap the citations in my edit as I couldn't figure out how).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooe ( talk • contribs)
This is a table of Mobile Ryzen products. Desktop devices have no place in it. 49.145.138.74 ( talk) 16:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
It would be nice if we could keep these new tables (this here + this one) in sync, with the existing APU tables (see AMD APUs). There is some new stuff like caches and XFR, but other stuff should stay the same IMHO. Thats why I removed the target segment column. Minor stuff: Order of TDP/Memory support, Released vs Release Date, Missing MHz. And why is this table sortable? PS: Also the sorting in the other tables the most powerful processor is on the bottom here it is the other way around... Cheers Wikiinger ( talk) 15:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Matthew Anthony Smith: In response to your latest edit, what's the distinction between "Vega" and "RX Vega"? You only updated one row in the table but not others. -- intgr [talk] 14:15, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
←Interesting that in the Embedded section of the Ryzen article the V1202B is shown as having an RX Vega 3 integrated GPU. This seems like an inconsistency to me. Furthermore, the AMD slide mentioned above specifically refers to desktop Raven Ridge APUs, all of which are shown as having RX Vega n (n is either 8 or 11) integrated GPUs in their template. 83.104.249.240 ( talk) 13:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
AMD just announced the Athlon Silver 3050U and Athlon Gold 3150U 14 nanometer parts. Could someone add them to this template? I'm not good with tables. -- Veikk0.ma 07:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)