![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is the use of introducing links to disambiguation pages to this template? Does it really matter for a legend key that the links read 05 instead of 00? The Banner talk 13:35, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
<br>
to split the lines of text make a difference? It seems to be something particular to only this template. One difference between this RDT and other uses is the inclusion of (two) collapsible section. Could that have something to do with it? (Another anomaly is the failure of the text box to show up on the row with "Caledonia Road".)
Useddenim (
talk) 20:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Here's the relevant code from {{ Rail-interchange}}:
{{#switch: {{lc: {{{1}}} }}
| toronto={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }}
| bus={{{icon|[[File:BSicon BUS1.svg|{{{size|12}}}px|link=List of Toronto Transit Commission bus routes]]}}}
{{if|exist|{{{4}}}|{{color box|black|'''{{{3}}}'''|white}}|{{if|exist|{{{3}}}|{{color box||{{{3}}}}} }} }}
}}
}}
}}
The code from the RDT is {{rint|toronto|bus|00}}
and {{rint|toronto|bus|00|x}}
. I don't see where there's a link to {{{3}}}
.
Useddenim (
talk) 20:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
I start to suspect the use of Template:Color box as culprit. While calling the '''{{{3}}}''' it picks it up as a link. But why and where? The Banner talk 00:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
This overly large template crashes the infobox when used in the related article. The additional information is not needed. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 13:39, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Due to a dodgy template to be use in an infobox, the template had to be split. The detailed version is cut out now and pasted here. It is not destroyed, as mr. Secondarywaltz tried to do. You need two to tango, and that was clearly not part of the plan. I hope the author can use this snippet to created a new, detailed template. The Banner talk 14:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is the use of introducing links to disambiguation pages to this template? Does it really matter for a legend key that the links read 05 instead of 00? The Banner talk 13:35, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
<br>
to split the lines of text make a difference? It seems to be something particular to only this template. One difference between this RDT and other uses is the inclusion of (two) collapsible section. Could that have something to do with it? (Another anomaly is the failure of the text box to show up on the row with "Caledonia Road".)
Useddenim (
talk) 20:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Here's the relevant code from {{ Rail-interchange}}:
{{#switch: {{lc: {{{1}}} }}
| toronto={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }}
| bus={{{icon|[[File:BSicon BUS1.svg|{{{size|12}}}px|link=List of Toronto Transit Commission bus routes]]}}}
{{if|exist|{{{4}}}|{{color box|black|'''{{{3}}}'''|white}}|{{if|exist|{{{3}}}|{{color box||{{{3}}}}} }} }}
}}
}}
}}
The code from the RDT is {{rint|toronto|bus|00}}
and {{rint|toronto|bus|00|x}}
. I don't see where there's a link to {{{3}}}
.
Useddenim (
talk) 20:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
I start to suspect the use of Template:Color box as culprit. While calling the '''{{{3}}}''' it picks it up as a link. But why and where? The Banner talk 00:53, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
This overly large template crashes the infobox when used in the related article. The additional information is not needed. Secondarywaltz ( talk) 13:39, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Due to a dodgy template to be use in an infobox, the template had to be split. The detailed version is cut out now and pasted here. It is not destroyed, as mr. Secondarywaltz tried to do. You need two to tango, and that was clearly not part of the plan. I hope the author can use this snippet to created a new, detailed template. The Banner talk 14:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)