I can see where you are going with the decade-by-decade format, but at anything above a very low-res small screen there is an awful lot of wasted space either side. Also, we really don't need the non-race years included, this is a navbox, not an almanac. Would you consider reformatting this to allow it to find its own formatting according to the page size of the viewer? Pyrop e 02:40, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've changed the layout. --
Matthead
Discuß
17:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- The original creator was mimicing the Template:Indy 500 in its layout and style. I don't think that there is anything wrong with the empty space at the sides, as this seems to be a trend in templates nowadays to make them full width, even if the text is not full width.
- And really, bright yellow isn't very helpful for a template. There's no reason this couldn't be the simple default color.
The359 (
talk)
18:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Default color then. -- Matthead Discuß 18:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- And really, bright yellow isn't very helpful for a template. There's no reason this couldn't be the simple default color.
The359 (
talk)
18:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Why was 1936 strikeouted.
De Mattia ( talk) 08:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- Do not worry. I figured it out after reading the article which I should have done first
I can see where you are going with the decade-by-decade format, but at anything above a very low-res small screen there is an awful lot of wasted space either side. Also, we really don't need the non-race years included, this is a navbox, not an almanac. Would you consider reformatting this to allow it to find its own formatting according to the page size of the viewer? Pyrop e 02:40, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've changed the layout. --
Matthead
Discuß
17:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- The original creator was mimicing the Template:Indy 500 in its layout and style. I don't think that there is anything wrong with the empty space at the sides, as this seems to be a trend in templates nowadays to make them full width, even if the text is not full width.
- And really, bright yellow isn't very helpful for a template. There's no reason this couldn't be the simple default color.
The359 (
talk)
18:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Default color then. -- Matthead Discuß 18:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- And really, bright yellow isn't very helpful for a template. There's no reason this couldn't be the simple default color.
The359 (
talk)
18:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Why was 1936 strikeouted.
De Mattia ( talk) 08:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- Do not worry. I figured it out after reading the article which I should have done first