![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This template connects places and people because they are connected to a single event. This is not a strong connection between these elements. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 11:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
I think the buildings should not be in the navbox. There not dealing with the earthquake directly. I suggest reading WP:NAVBOX. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 10:35, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Regardless of whether or not the 2010_Haiti_earthquake_conspiracy_theories article is deleted (and as of this moment there is still an open debate on that), I don't think it has any business being at the top of the template. A matter of fact, I don't think it should even be in the template. It is essentially composed of theories by people/groups/movements that had no direct relationship with the earthquake and are exploiting it for their own political or person goals. People can find it through the 2010 Haiti earthquake category tag. David Straub ( talk) 06:13, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
There have been deaths and there have been survivals. There is a story of a 6 year old boy who got stuck in the debris and he drank the rain water that came down. They found him 6 days later alive. Another story is about a ship that flipped over because of a tsunami wave. The men survived because they were very well expirianced. They were washed up on shore 3 days later.
-Dylan Oakes-
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This template connects places and people because they are connected to a single event. This is not a strong connection between these elements. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 11:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
I think the buildings should not be in the navbox. There not dealing with the earthquake directly. I suggest reading WP:NAVBOX. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 10:35, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Regardless of whether or not the 2010_Haiti_earthquake_conspiracy_theories article is deleted (and as of this moment there is still an open debate on that), I don't think it has any business being at the top of the template. A matter of fact, I don't think it should even be in the template. It is essentially composed of theories by people/groups/movements that had no direct relationship with the earthquake and are exploiting it for their own political or person goals. People can find it through the 2010 Haiti earthquake category tag. David Straub ( talk) 06:13, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
There have been deaths and there have been survivals. There is a story of a 6 year old boy who got stuck in the debris and he drank the rain water that came down. They found him 6 days later alive. Another story is about a ship that flipped over because of a tsunami wave. The men survived because they were very well expirianced. They were washed up on shore 3 days later.
-Dylan Oakes-