Template:Importance inline
This page is a
soft redirect.
Wikipedia:Notability does not determine relevance of article content. It only determines whether or not we will have an entire article about a topic. For an explanation of the difference, see
WP:NOTREL. |
If you are attempting to flag content in an article on the basis of its importance or relevance to the subject, please use one of the templates below, as appropriate:
{{
Trivia}}
– Suggests relocation of the relevant details in a trivia section, to another section (or article).{{
Trivia section}}
– Same as above, but goes at the top of the trivia section, rather than the top of the article.{{
Off topic}}
– For a section that has wandered from the topic of the article{{
Content}}
– For an article or section containing information whose relevance is disputed.{{
Importance section}}
– For a section with information that is simply off-topic for the article, and needs removal or relocation to another article.{{
Importance inline}}
– For a particular item that is off-topic needs removal or relocation to another article.{{
Self-sourcing examples}}
– For an article or section with poorly cited examples.{{
Better source example}}
– For a particular instance of a poorly cited example.{{
Relevance inline}}
– For a particular item that doesn't seem to belong in the context at all.{{
Non sequitur}}
– For a namedropping of someone or something the relevance of which may not be clear to the reader.{{
Overly detailed}}
– For excessive focus on minute details not of interest to our general readership.{{
Summarize section}}
– For sections that are too detailed and need to be summarized.{{
Example farm}}
– For excessive use of examples.{{
Too many see alsos}}
– For an indiscriminate "See also" section, most of which should be pruned or integrated into the prose.{{
In popular culture}}
– For excessive "popular culture" and "media references" sorts of material.{{
Fiction trivia}}
(or {{
In-universe}}
) – For too many trivial fictional references (or too much "in-universe" detail).{{
Long plot}}
, {{
All plot}}
– For excessively detailed plot summaries.{{
Cleanup book}}
, {{
Cleanup film}}
– For excessive detail about particular types of works (other than plot and fictional or in-universe issues).{{
Game trivia}}
– For too much gaming-related trivia.{{
MOSLOW}}
– For list that does not follow the Manual of Style for lists of works, e.g. not in chronological order{{
Cleanup university}}
, {{
Cleanup school}}
– For excessive detail about an educational institution.{{
Famous}}
– For an indiscriminate list of "famous" people associated in some way with a topic.{{
Localist}}
– For local-interest trivia that is unverifiable or otherwise unencyclopedic.{{
Prose}}
– Suggests converting into prose a section that consists of a list.{{
Cleanup list}}
– For indiscriminate lists that need reduction.{{
List to table}}
– For use where a table would be better than a list.
Template:Importance inline
This page is a
soft redirect.
Wikipedia:Notability does not determine relevance of article content. It only determines whether or not we will have an entire article about a topic. For an explanation of the difference, see
WP:NOTREL. |
If you are attempting to flag content in an article on the basis of its importance or relevance to the subject, please use one of the templates below, as appropriate:
{{
Trivia}}
– Suggests relocation of the relevant details in a trivia section, to another section (or article).{{
Trivia section}}
– Same as above, but goes at the top of the trivia section, rather than the top of the article.{{
Off topic}}
– For a section that has wandered from the topic of the article{{
Content}}
– For an article or section containing information whose relevance is disputed.{{
Importance section}}
– For a section with information that is simply off-topic for the article, and needs removal or relocation to another article.{{
Importance inline}}
– For a particular item that is off-topic needs removal or relocation to another article.{{
Self-sourcing examples}}
– For an article or section with poorly cited examples.{{
Better source example}}
– For a particular instance of a poorly cited example.{{
Relevance inline}}
– For a particular item that doesn't seem to belong in the context at all.{{
Non sequitur}}
– For a namedropping of someone or something the relevance of which may not be clear to the reader.{{
Overly detailed}}
– For excessive focus on minute details not of interest to our general readership.{{
Summarize section}}
– For sections that are too detailed and need to be summarized.{{
Example farm}}
– For excessive use of examples.{{
Too many see alsos}}
– For an indiscriminate "See also" section, most of which should be pruned or integrated into the prose.{{
In popular culture}}
– For excessive "popular culture" and "media references" sorts of material.{{
Fiction trivia}}
(or {{
In-universe}}
) – For too many trivial fictional references (or too much "in-universe" detail).{{
Long plot}}
, {{
All plot}}
– For excessively detailed plot summaries.{{
Cleanup book}}
, {{
Cleanup film}}
– For excessive detail about particular types of works (other than plot and fictional or in-universe issues).{{
Game trivia}}
– For too much gaming-related trivia.{{
MOSLOW}}
– For list that does not follow the Manual of Style for lists of works, e.g. not in chronological order{{
Cleanup university}}
, {{
Cleanup school}}
– For excessive detail about an educational institution.{{
Famous}}
– For an indiscriminate list of "famous" people associated in some way with a topic.{{
Localist}}
– For local-interest trivia that is unverifiable or otherwise unencyclopedic.{{
Prose}}
– Suggests converting into prose a section that consists of a list.{{
Cleanup list}}
– For indiscriminate lists that need reduction.{{
List to table}}
– For use where a table would be better than a list.