The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 12:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
The article is new enough (was nominated within five days of creation), long enough (4300 characters readable prose), well-sourced (offline sources seem reliable). No copyvio as done on two spot checks. As this is not a self-nom no QPQ is required. Hook is cited ("pioneered and was strongly associated with..."). I think you are good to go!Raymie (
t •
c) 22:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Added "pictured" to the hook because there is an image, but the review did not review the image and needs to (see "Other" section on the edit page here, the number 2 criteria).
Raymie, you might want to take another look, and be sure to put the resulting icon at the beginning of your review where it is easily seen, not buried in the middle of a paragraph. (BTW, the "new enough" guideline was changed from five days to seven days a couple of months back.) Also fixed the DYKmake and DYKnom templates, which were not generated properly.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 22:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
I didn't think to check the picture, but if it's a Featured Picture I certainly think it is a worthy picture for the Main Page. Again, good to go.
Raymie (
t •
c) 23:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 12:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
The article is new enough (was nominated within five days of creation), long enough (4300 characters readable prose), well-sourced (offline sources seem reliable). No copyvio as done on two spot checks. As this is not a self-nom no QPQ is required. Hook is cited ("pioneered and was strongly associated with..."). I think you are good to go!Raymie (
t •
c) 22:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Added "pictured" to the hook because there is an image, but the review did not review the image and needs to (see "Other" section on the edit page here, the number 2 criteria).
Raymie, you might want to take another look, and be sure to put the resulting icon at the beginning of your review where it is easily seen, not buried in the middle of a paragraph. (BTW, the "new enough" guideline was changed from five days to seven days a couple of months back.) Also fixed the DYKmake and DYKnom templates, which were not generated properly.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 22:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
I didn't think to check the picture, but if it's a Featured Picture I certainly think it is a worthy picture for the Main Page. Again, good to go.
Raymie (
t •
c) 23:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)