- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
HalfGig
talk 13:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment
( )
- ... that none of the three major professional sports teams owned by Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment have won a championship since 1967?
- Comment: My first nomination!
Improved to Good Article status by Danlaycock ( talk). Self nominated at 03:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC).
-
Well-written (obviously, GA), long enough, nominated soon enough, interesting and cited hook. QPQ not needed as nominator only has one DYK credit. The only thing I'll change is "has won"→"have won" for slightly better subject-verb agreement. Otherwise, hook is a go. Dea db eef11:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
HalfGig
talk 13:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment
( )
- ... that none of the three major professional sports teams owned by Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment have won a championship since 1967?
- Comment: My first nomination!
Improved to Good Article status by Danlaycock ( talk). Self nominated at 03:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC).
-
Well-written (obviously, GA), long enough, nominated soon enough, interesting and cited hook. QPQ not needed as nominator only has one DYK credit. The only thing I'll change is "has won"→"have won" for slightly better subject-verb agreement. Otherwise, hook is a go.
Dea db eef11:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
-