Zaki al-Arsuzi was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 26, 2012). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Arab world Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Syria Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Why is Hanna Battatu, a known Iraqi nationalist historian nearly the sole source on a Syrian figure? It is certain that he would want to play up the role of Michel Aflaq, who lived in Iraq most of his later life, than give credit to a major figure in the Syrian Ba'ath, this article gives no credit to Zaki al-Arsuzi at all, it is almost entirely in the point of view that al-Arsuzi neither helped found the Ba'ath, nor contributed anything at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.183.91.215 ( talk) 06:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC) reply

I have not gone through the whole article in detail yet, but one part of the legacy section needs to be clarified: There were several ba'athists who denounced Aflaq as a "thief"; these critics claim that Aflaq had stolen the ba'athist ideology from al-Arsuzi and proclaimed it as his own. Who are these "several ba'athists who denounced Aflaq"? -- Al Ameer son ( talk) 18:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Fixed. -- TIAYN ( talk) 19:33, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply

There are a lot of incorrect ISBNs in this article. Has someone made them up? Mr Stephen ( talk) 12:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Nope, used Google Books. -- TIAYN ( talk) 13:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Fair enough. Steel & Silk has a bad checksum. It's listed here as ISBN  978-1885942400 Parameter error in {{ ISBN}}: checksum Let's go to the title page at Google Books, and we see we have four choices – but none of them are 978-1885942400. Mr Stephen ( talk) 13:53, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Fixed all the ISBNs with their corresponding editions from Google Books. Should be alright now. Yazan ( talk) 02:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zaki al-Arsuzi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jarry1250 ( talk · contribs) 11:10, 5 January 2012 (UTC) reply

This article is well on its way to becoming a Good Article. Indeed, I could not find anything on which to fail this article, and so it will pass. However, before I do pass it, I would like to see if we couldn't get the article to a strong-GA/potential-FA quality:

• (see comment below) The images are both acceptable, although it would be very useful to have more information about them and their authors. Specifically, it is assumed that both originated in Syria, but it would be good to have at least some evidence of that.

The webside were the images were uploaded from those not say anything more then what is already mentioned.... The author is not mentioned, and where the picture was taken is not mentioned. -- TIAYN ( talk) 17:14, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Do the photographs appear anywhere else? - Jarry1250  ^{Deliberation needed} 22:35, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply

I couldn't find anything.... -- TIAYN ( talk) 11:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply

• Done It would be good to know exactly how many of "Influenced by" are specifically named (presumably in [3]).
• Fixed (by someone else) Although not wrong, the article's use of long citations with different page numbers is very rare, and many would think it overly dense.
  • I'm not the author of this article, but has been following it for a while. I took the liberty of fixing the citations and the biblio section, to be more readable and added isbn/doi where possible, and removed the long citations. Ofcourse if the author prefers otherwise he can revert. I find this much more readable with shorter cites. Yazan ( talk) 00:41, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
• "secondary school" (lead and prose) - could we give some approximate ages here?

I can't find anything on that... -- TIAYN ( talk) 17:14, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply

A pity, but yeah... - Jarry1250  ^{Deliberation needed} 22:35, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply

• Fixed It is unclear at the moment whether al-Arsuzi was refused membership of the merged party, or whether he simply never requested it.
• Better? Note sure "Thus, if humans were rational creatures, every individual would organise his way of life to confirm their own status. Individuals will participate to work, collaborating with his compatriots, to take over the affairs of state from the colonists, who acted as barriers for such changes" makes sense.
• (added some other refs. too) I am concerned by the reliance of paragraph one of #Legacy of Suleiman's work. In particular, his views on al-Arsuzi and al-Husri need to be compared or added to those of on or more other writers; or, at the very least, the reliance should be made clearer.

The problem with al-Arsuzi, which many historians have noted, is that very little has been written about him; sadly, thats nearly the only thing people have written about al-Arsuzi, he was a great thinker, but is not remembered. I can look, but I doubt I can find any more sources. -- TIAYN ( talk) 21:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply

• Looks good I have changed the prose in a number of places, so do check I haven't changed anything for the worse :)

Looks good. -- TIAYN ( talk) 17:14, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Regards, - Jarry1250  ^{Deliberation needed} 11:10, 5 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Only one question outstanding, will re-read and look to pass in a couple of days' time. - Jarry1250  ^{Deliberation needed} 22:35, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Okay, I've made a couple more edits. Are they okay with you? - Jarry1250  ^{Deliberation needed} 16:48, 11 January 2012 (UTC) reply

They look good. -- TIAYN ( talk) 22:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Oh, and one final thing: I don't think my earlier point about membership of the merged party never being taken up/denied was resolved in both places (lead and prose) -- lead still says "denied", prose is still ambiguous. Sorry to be annoying :) - Jarry1250  ^{Deliberation needed} 22:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Done -- TIAYN ( talk) 15:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC) reply

I'm still unclear, actually, on whether he wanted membership. Do the sources suggest he wanted to be part of the new party leadership but was declined on grounds of his mental health, or that, because of his mental health, he was unable or unwilling to become a member? (This is a side issue, I'll get round to officially passing the article at some point.) - Jarry1250  ^{Deliberation needed} 16:32, 13 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Done (i think) -- TIAYN ( talk) 07:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Okay, so I went to check the source listed, but it says only that al-Arsuzi was "not given a position in the new party". Do you have a source for saying he was not *in* the party? (Also, do you have a source for "because of his declining mental capabilities" or whatever the exact text used in the article is?) - Jarry1250  ^{Deliberation needed} 12:18, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Done - I remember I read it somewhere, but I've been unable to find the ref (I'll find it eventually!) -- TIAYN ( talk) 20:40, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Failed

It is with great regret that I am forced to fail this article. This is being done under criterion 2, sub-criteria (b) and (c). Unfortunately the divergence between what the sources cited say and what the article text said was simply too great in the passage I looked at. Whilst good articles can include uncited material, I feel it would be wrong to pass an article that included uncited material that appeared cited in this regard. Therefore I feel I must fail this article. I appreciate that TIAYN is an established editor - I am not suggesting that the errors were intentional - but that it was a deviance that I couldn't let by.

If there was now an active process of trimming back the prose to keep to the facts outlined by the sources (not their exacting wording, mind), I think the article would pass GA easily. I invited the nominator or others to perform such a process in his or her own time, and I would be more than happy to rereview the article and pass it on those grounds. In the meantime, I can be contacted on my user talk page. Many thanks, - Jarry1250  ^{Deliberation needed} 18:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC) reply

An image used in this article, File:Hafez al-Assad.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 17:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 21:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC) reply