| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
World Tag Team Championship (WWE) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
When exactly do the reigns start? Some say they start when they're aired on TV, others when they actually happen, when they get taped. For example, did Deuce and Domino win the titles and become champions on April 17, or April 20? WWE.com lists it at April 20, yet some are saying it's April 17. I checked and couldn't find an answer at WP:PW. Is there a general consensus? Anakinjmt 22:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Although we don't add the title change until it airs in the US, when it does we list when the title change happened. SmackDown! was taped on April 17th so that is when the title change happened. Therefore Deuce 'N Domino have been Tag Team champions for 4 days now. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:Deuce 'N Domino Tag Champs.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
shouldn't it be said their the 2nd longest tag team in the WWE tag team history —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- No. If they beome the longest reigning, then yes. Until then it stays off the page. Thanks, ♥ Nici♥ Vampire♥ Heart♥ 17:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Ok I apology's Supermike ( talk 17:90 April 12 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 00:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's ok. ;) Everyone has to ask questions to learn. ♥ Nici♥ Vampire♥ Heart♥ 00:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
umm Just to say. I think your wrong with the shortest reign as Batista & Rey Mysterio actually held the titles only for a week (7 days) as they won them on the smackdown before armageddon 2005 and lost them a week later —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.17.89 ( talk) 21:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Really? Was there one of those Best of 2005 and then the following week it was the match? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.17.89 ( talk) 23:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Since the title change has not aired yet, shouldn't Ryder and Hawkins still be listed as the current champions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by HidyHoTim ( talk • contribs) 10:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- No. Wikipedia allows spoilers, per
WP:SPOILER, as long as there is a
reliable source to back it up. Which is what we have. ♥
Nici♥
Vampire♥
Heart♥ 16:10, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- WrestleView? Since when has that become a reliable source? WWEISREAL 19:12, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Wresleview's is a reliable source and has been for a while wrestlezone isn't Adster95 ( talk) 19:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Why does wwe refer to the belts as unified rather tha undisputed. Sid 4x ( talk) 22:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Nobody but WWE would know that answer. Also,
Wikipedia is not a forum.
Gavyn Sykes (
talk) 00:37, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- The titles have been unified, like in the boxing world. They are not "undisputed" because the claim on them are not "in dispute" Jericho was the "Undisputed" champ years ago because the WWF/E and WCW titles have a common lineage that came from a disputed match decades ago where the WWWF left the NWA because of said dispute. Ciderbarrel ( talk) 00:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Wrong it was called the Undisputed Championship because There was no oter World Heavyweight CHampionships in existance during the Time the Jericho unified the two belts there for the WWE could legitimatly claim the the new wwe title as Undisputed where as now there are multiple world titles in the wrestling world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.93.167.109 ( talk) 01:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- The last comment is correct, in a way. There was no major world title back then. The NWA Title could still be considered a world title, but the NWA was not in the mainstream at that time. Today the Unified WWE Tag Titles can't be undisputed since there is the NWA World Tag Team Titles, the TNA World Tag Titles, the IWGP Tag Titles, etc. Though that would probably not stop the WWE and their holier than though attitude.--
Will
C 03:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Actually both Ciderbarrel and the IP were correct the. The WWWF/NWA event was part of the dispute. -- Unquestionable Truth-- 04:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
To answer the question, it's because that's what they decided to name it this year. Mshake3 ( talk) 04:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Somehow... that is also correct... and the more accurate response.-- Unquestionable Truth-- 04:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Should the Unified Tag team championship get its own page? Or should it be treated like the old undisputed WWE Championship and just stay on the same page as its respective predessesor? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.93.167.109 ( talk) 21:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well according to the title histories on WWE.com, neither title has been retired, which means that they are technically still separate titles defended simultaneously. Its weird but that’s just the way it is.-- Unquestionable Truth-- 22:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
In the history be sure to explain that the currently used 2002 WWE tag titles Tag Team titles can trace lineage and are the sucessors to the now retired World Tag Team titles because of previous unification —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.78.164 ( talk) 23:26, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Question:
Just wanting some clarification on something that seems likely to happen:
Should Wade Barrett come out and say something like the tag belts will be defended under "Nexus Rules" or something similar, will we recognize all Nexus members as champs a la The Freebirds, Demolition, or the Spirit Squad?
Vjmlhds 20:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on WWE Tag Team Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090408133221/http://www.wwe.com:80/inside/titlehistory/worldtagteam/20090405WorldTagChamps1 to http://www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/worldtagteam/20090405WorldTagChamps1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 06:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
WWE Raw Tag Team Championship → RAW Tag Team Championship – discussion has taken place and support for the new page title is near-unanimous – Weweremarshall ( talk) 21:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request ( permalink). — Sam Sailor 21:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
-
Comment: I don't know where that discussion took place. —
Sam
Sailor 21:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- here: Talk:WWE_SmackDown_Tag_Team_Championship#Requested_move_2_September_2016 ~ mcLovin'tosh ( talk) 03:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
* '''Support'''or* '''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles. - STRONG SUPPORT as long as "Raw" is not in all caps. mcLovin'tosh ( talk) 03:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Weak support' per my reasoning on Talk:WWE SmackDown Tag Team Championship. It would have been useful to have one discussion for all instead of all of these separate RMs. LM2000 ( talk) 03:30, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose, it's fine the way it is. You don't need to drop the WWE from it. It's still WWE Raw. (talk page stalker) Crash Under ride 04:55, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose After thinking about this WWE should be in the Articles title. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 05:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment, after Raw changed the WWE Tag Team Championship to "Raw Tag Team Championship", I am also thinking about opposing the move. I am about to convince myself that it's probably just fine the way it is for now. User:Mclovin'tosh ( talk) 14:32, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose as per Crash Underride. There is no sufficient evidence that the WWE is dropped (such a constantly changing list on WWE.com that might well use short forms for brevity's sake is not eough). Also, editors should be much slower to move articles. Currently, the opposite is true. Str1977 (talk) 17:11, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose per Str1977. Feed back 02:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Request for a lock
Cmon Squared circle nerds trolling the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.164.28.60 ( talk) 03:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
People keep changing the current champions and not putting the actual champions (Strowman and the kid) and vandalizing the page with other spam like "Chris Benoit is innocent". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.232.230.248 ( talk) 04:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 | This
edit request to
Wrestlemania 34 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Temporary Extended confirmed protection: for 9 days Reasons
- Copyright
- Vandalism
- Unsourced content
- Disruptive content
- Possible use of multiple accounts to break rules
Vandals keep posting copyright stuff and vandalism disrespectfully after a absurd Raw Tag Champion Match. (Undo ...then here another vandal and undo again...here another...this is outrageous) 🥇BUSriderSFUser ( talk • contribs) 06:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Not done::what you wrote here is a request for protection, not an edit request.
L293D (
☎ •
✎) 13:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- This is request for Extended Confirmed Request Protection (a Semi Protection, not enough for next 7 days as you check the history vandal continues.) @
L293D:
🥇BUSriderSFUser (
talk •
contribs) 20:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- As you have been told, thats not what this is used for. -
Galatz
Talk 20:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oh yea, Vandals on All WWE Raw Tag Champions should be locked, (All WWE Raw Tag Team Champion Wikipedia Page, Braun Strowman Wikapedia Page, Cesaro and Sheamus Wikipedia Page, (Independent pages) Cesaro Wikipedia Page, and Sheamus Wikipedia Page for the next 7 days. 🥇BUSriderSFUser ( talk • contribs) 20:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- As you have been told, thats not what this is used for. -
Galatz
Talk 20:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- This is request for Extended Confirmed Request Protection (a Semi Protection, not enough for next 7 days as you check the history vandal continues.) @
L293D:
🥇BUSriderSFUser (
talk •
contribs) 20:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
@ BusriderSF2015: as I already told you, the right place to put your request is not here but at WP:RFPP. L293D ( ☎ • ✎) 21:10, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Rumours had been floated that Nicholas may be Shane McMahon's son or Jon Stewart's son being masqueraded as a fan, but Brad Shepard of Bodyslam.net has now confirmed Nicholas does have a WWE employee as a relative - official John Cone. John Cone's wiki pagee already mentions that his son is Raw Tag Team Champion so I feel that links for Nicholas should be redirected to John Cone's Wikipedia page - 2A02:C7F:C243:E200:44C4:E184:5E01:C446 ( talk) 09:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thats all it is right now, a rumor. Once we get an official release on it we can. Nicholas is a very common fist name. Unfortunately you can't have a unsourced source... many reliable sources don't know Gvstaylor1 ( talk) 14:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
WWE.com currently lists the champions as "Woken" Matt Hardy & Bray Wyatt. The April 30th Raw however, seems to confirm their team name as being The Deleters of Worlds. I'll go ahead and change this. GhostOfDanGurney ( talk) 15:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Until the WWE's official site says that, don't.
Nickag989
talk 15:51, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Aye aye, captain. :] GhostOfDanGurney ( talk) 16:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
I started a discussion at Talk:WWE Tag Team Championship#Requested move 9 August 2019 that relates to this page. Please take a look and contribute. - Galatz גאליץ שיחה Talk 19:05, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
World Tag Team Championship (WWE) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
When exactly do the reigns start? Some say they start when they're aired on TV, others when they actually happen, when they get taped. For example, did Deuce and Domino win the titles and become champions on April 17, or April 20? WWE.com lists it at April 20, yet some are saying it's April 17. I checked and couldn't find an answer at WP:PW. Is there a general consensus? Anakinjmt 22:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Although we don't add the title change until it airs in the US, when it does we list when the title change happened. SmackDown! was taped on April 17th so that is when the title change happened. Therefore Deuce 'N Domino have been Tag Team champions for 4 days now. -- bulletproof 3:16 22:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:Deuce 'N Domino Tag Champs.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
shouldn't it be said their the 2nd longest tag team in the WWE tag team history —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- No. If they beome the longest reigning, then yes. Until then it stays off the page. Thanks, ♥ Nici♥ Vampire♥ Heart♥ 17:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Ok I apology's Supermike ( talk 17:90 April 12 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 00:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's ok. ;) Everyone has to ask questions to learn. ♥ Nici♥ Vampire♥ Heart♥ 00:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
umm Just to say. I think your wrong with the shortest reign as Batista & Rey Mysterio actually held the titles only for a week (7 days) as they won them on the smackdown before armageddon 2005 and lost them a week later —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.17.89 ( talk) 21:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Really? Was there one of those Best of 2005 and then the following week it was the match? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.17.89 ( talk) 23:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Since the title change has not aired yet, shouldn't Ryder and Hawkins still be listed as the current champions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by HidyHoTim ( talk • contribs) 10:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- No. Wikipedia allows spoilers, per
WP:SPOILER, as long as there is a
reliable source to back it up. Which is what we have. ♥
Nici♥
Vampire♥
Heart♥ 16:10, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- WrestleView? Since when has that become a reliable source? WWEISREAL 19:12, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Wresleview's is a reliable source and has been for a while wrestlezone isn't Adster95 ( talk) 19:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Why does wwe refer to the belts as unified rather tha undisputed. Sid 4x ( talk) 22:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Nobody but WWE would know that answer. Also,
Wikipedia is not a forum.
Gavyn Sykes (
talk) 00:37, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- The titles have been unified, like in the boxing world. They are not "undisputed" because the claim on them are not "in dispute" Jericho was the "Undisputed" champ years ago because the WWF/E and WCW titles have a common lineage that came from a disputed match decades ago where the WWWF left the NWA because of said dispute. Ciderbarrel ( talk) 00:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Wrong it was called the Undisputed Championship because There was no oter World Heavyweight CHampionships in existance during the Time the Jericho unified the two belts there for the WWE could legitimatly claim the the new wwe title as Undisputed where as now there are multiple world titles in the wrestling world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.93.167.109 ( talk) 01:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- The last comment is correct, in a way. There was no major world title back then. The NWA Title could still be considered a world title, but the NWA was not in the mainstream at that time. Today the Unified WWE Tag Titles can't be undisputed since there is the NWA World Tag Team Titles, the TNA World Tag Titles, the IWGP Tag Titles, etc. Though that would probably not stop the WWE and their holier than though attitude.--
Will
C 03:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Actually both Ciderbarrel and the IP were correct the. The WWWF/NWA event was part of the dispute. -- Unquestionable Truth-- 04:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
To answer the question, it's because that's what they decided to name it this year. Mshake3 ( talk) 04:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Somehow... that is also correct... and the more accurate response.-- Unquestionable Truth-- 04:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Should the Unified Tag team championship get its own page? Or should it be treated like the old undisputed WWE Championship and just stay on the same page as its respective predessesor? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.93.167.109 ( talk) 21:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well according to the title histories on WWE.com, neither title has been retired, which means that they are technically still separate titles defended simultaneously. Its weird but that’s just the way it is.-- Unquestionable Truth-- 22:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
In the history be sure to explain that the currently used 2002 WWE tag titles Tag Team titles can trace lineage and are the sucessors to the now retired World Tag Team titles because of previous unification —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.78.164 ( talk) 23:26, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Question:
Just wanting some clarification on something that seems likely to happen:
Should Wade Barrett come out and say something like the tag belts will be defended under "Nexus Rules" or something similar, will we recognize all Nexus members as champs a la The Freebirds, Demolition, or the Spirit Squad?
Vjmlhds 20:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on WWE Tag Team Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090408133221/http://www.wwe.com:80/inside/titlehistory/worldtagteam/20090405WorldTagChamps1 to http://www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/worldtagteam/20090405WorldTagChamps1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 06:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
WWE Raw Tag Team Championship → RAW Tag Team Championship – discussion has taken place and support for the new page title is near-unanimous – Weweremarshall ( talk) 21:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request ( permalink). — Sam Sailor 21:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
-
Comment: I don't know where that discussion took place. —
Sam
Sailor 21:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- here: Talk:WWE_SmackDown_Tag_Team_Championship#Requested_move_2_September_2016 ~ mcLovin'tosh ( talk) 03:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
* '''Support'''or* '''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles. - STRONG SUPPORT as long as "Raw" is not in all caps. mcLovin'tosh ( talk) 03:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Weak support' per my reasoning on Talk:WWE SmackDown Tag Team Championship. It would have been useful to have one discussion for all instead of all of these separate RMs. LM2000 ( talk) 03:30, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose, it's fine the way it is. You don't need to drop the WWE from it. It's still WWE Raw. (talk page stalker) Crash Under ride 04:55, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose After thinking about this WWE should be in the Articles title. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 05:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment, after Raw changed the WWE Tag Team Championship to "Raw Tag Team Championship", I am also thinking about opposing the move. I am about to convince myself that it's probably just fine the way it is for now. User:Mclovin'tosh ( talk) 14:32, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose as per Crash Underride. There is no sufficient evidence that the WWE is dropped (such a constantly changing list on WWE.com that might well use short forms for brevity's sake is not eough). Also, editors should be much slower to move articles. Currently, the opposite is true. Str1977 (talk) 17:11, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose per Str1977. Feed back 02:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Request for a lock
Cmon Squared circle nerds trolling the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.164.28.60 ( talk) 03:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
People keep changing the current champions and not putting the actual champions (Strowman and the kid) and vandalizing the page with other spam like "Chris Benoit is innocent". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.232.230.248 ( talk) 04:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
| This
edit request to
Wrestlemania 34 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Temporary Extended confirmed protection: for 9 days Reasons
- Copyright
- Vandalism
- Unsourced content
- Disruptive content
- Possible use of multiple accounts to break rules
Vandals keep posting copyright stuff and vandalism disrespectfully after a absurd Raw Tag Champion Match. (Undo ...then here another vandal and undo again...here another...this is outrageous) 🥇BUSriderSFUser ( talk • contribs) 06:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Not done::what you wrote here is a request for protection, not an edit request.
L293D (
☎ •
✎) 13:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- This is request for Extended Confirmed Request Protection (a Semi Protection, not enough for next 7 days as you check the history vandal continues.) @
L293D:
🥇BUSriderSFUser (
talk •
contribs) 20:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- As you have been told, thats not what this is used for. -
Galatz
Talk 20:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oh yea, Vandals on All WWE Raw Tag Champions should be locked, (All WWE Raw Tag Team Champion Wikipedia Page, Braun Strowman Wikapedia Page, Cesaro and Sheamus Wikipedia Page, (Independent pages) Cesaro Wikipedia Page, and Sheamus Wikipedia Page for the next 7 days. 🥇BUSriderSFUser ( talk • contribs) 20:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- As you have been told, thats not what this is used for. -
Galatz
Talk 20:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- This is request for Extended Confirmed Request Protection (a Semi Protection, not enough for next 7 days as you check the history vandal continues.) @
L293D:
🥇BUSriderSFUser (
talk •
contribs) 20:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
@ BusriderSF2015: as I already told you, the right place to put your request is not here but at WP:RFPP. L293D ( ☎ • ✎) 21:10, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Rumours had been floated that Nicholas may be Shane McMahon's son or Jon Stewart's son being masqueraded as a fan, but Brad Shepard of Bodyslam.net has now confirmed Nicholas does have a WWE employee as a relative - official John Cone. John Cone's wiki pagee already mentions that his son is Raw Tag Team Champion so I feel that links for Nicholas should be redirected to John Cone's Wikipedia page - 2A02:C7F:C243:E200:44C4:E184:5E01:C446 ( talk) 09:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thats all it is right now, a rumor. Once we get an official release on it we can. Nicholas is a very common fist name. Unfortunately you can't have a unsourced source... many reliable sources don't know Gvstaylor1 ( talk) 14:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
WWE.com currently lists the champions as "Woken" Matt Hardy & Bray Wyatt. The April 30th Raw however, seems to confirm their team name as being The Deleters of Worlds. I'll go ahead and change this. GhostOfDanGurney ( talk) 15:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Until the WWE's official site says that, don't.
Nickag989
talk 15:51, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Aye aye, captain. :] GhostOfDanGurney ( talk) 16:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
I started a discussion at Talk:WWE Tag Team Championship#Requested move 9 August 2019 that relates to this page. Please take a look and contribute. - Galatz גאליץ שיחה Talk 19:05, 9 August 2019 (UTC)