A fact from Word list appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 October 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Maybe the correct form "outrageous" would be more relevant to be included than "outragious." (I guess the present figure refers to the misspelled form, isn't it?) Adam78 13:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Could someone create a frequency list of the words occuring in the Wikipedia? -- Sloyment ( talk) 07:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yug ( talk • contribs) 12:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
"Frequency lists are a necessary prerequisite for building of an electronic dictionary" - hardly. You can build one in many ways without frequency lists. The sentence is poor English anyway (if something is a prerequisite, then by definition it is necessary). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.236.94 ( talk) 06:44, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
wtf? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.100.61.20 ( talk) 22:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Word lists by frequency. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
I assume that most people come to this page looking for links to word frequency lists, not for a huge discussion of such lists. There should be a front section giving links for the major languages, leaving the discussion of such lists (which most people don't actually come here looking for) to later sections.
2601:184:497F:8D29:4C45:6105:30EB:8FA7 ( talk) 04:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
A fact from Word list appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 October 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Maybe the correct form "outrageous" would be more relevant to be included than "outragious." (I guess the present figure refers to the misspelled form, isn't it?) Adam78 13:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Could someone create a frequency list of the words occuring in the Wikipedia? -- Sloyment ( talk) 07:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yug ( talk • contribs) 12:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
"Frequency lists are a necessary prerequisite for building of an electronic dictionary" - hardly. You can build one in many ways without frequency lists. The sentence is poor English anyway (if something is a prerequisite, then by definition it is necessary). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.236.94 ( talk) 06:44, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
wtf? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.100.61.20 ( talk) 22:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Word lists by frequency. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
I assume that most people come to this page looking for links to word frequency lists, not for a huge discussion of such lists. There should be a front section giving links for the major languages, leaving the discussion of such lists (which most people don't actually come here looking for) to later sections.
2601:184:497F:8D29:4C45:6105:30EB:8FA7 ( talk) 04:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)