This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
When the going gets tough, the tough get going article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I've substantially cut back and rewritten the article, removing a major section that was pure, unsourced WP:OR, and adding new information about earliest attestations from the 1950s sourced to a new, and apparently solid reference. This new source, however, is WP:TERTIARY, and thus should be replaced by proper WP:SECONDARY sources. Fortunately, this may not be as difficult as might otherwise be the case, since this tertiary source itself lists two secondary sources which should be tracked down and added to the article, replacing the current ref. The improved state of the article is such that the 2017 {{ unreliable}} tag is no longer needed per WP:WTRMT, and so I removed it. Mathglot ( talk) 08:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
It seems doubtful if this topic will ever gain enough content to be more than a stub, which would mean it fails WP:NOPAGE. Perhaps it should be considered for transwikification to Wikiquote? Mathglot ( talk) 09:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
When the going gets tough, the tough get going article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
I've substantially cut back and rewritten the article, removing a major section that was pure, unsourced WP:OR, and adding new information about earliest attestations from the 1950s sourced to a new, and apparently solid reference. This new source, however, is WP:TERTIARY, and thus should be replaced by proper WP:SECONDARY sources. Fortunately, this may not be as difficult as might otherwise be the case, since this tertiary source itself lists two secondary sources which should be tracked down and added to the article, replacing the current ref. The improved state of the article is such that the 2017 {{ unreliable}} tag is no longer needed per WP:WTRMT, and so I removed it. Mathglot ( talk) 08:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
It seems doubtful if this topic will ever gain enough content to be more than a stub, which would mean it fails WP:NOPAGE. Perhaps it should be considered for transwikification to Wikiquote? Mathglot ( talk) 09:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC)