Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch
Overall this article is good. Alas, while I tried to be nitpicky, I couldn't find any issues that jumped out at me. If you wish to take the article further, then go for a peer review, but I'm satisfied with passing this article as a GA as it stands. Well Dunn. </pun> Wizardman 04:40, 14 September 2009 (UTC) reply