This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
What a letdown! An article about "the most eloquent speech ever made to Congress", yet we don't see it here at all. If there is no surviving transcript, the reader should be told up front and not left to wonder. âThe preceding unsigned comment was added by PJ6 ( talk ⢠contribs) 12:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC).
This reads like a cliff's note. Not an article.
This does not even include the positions of Webster and Hayne. I have to say, it has almost no information. â Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.47.95.208 ( talk) 20:16, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
It would seem to disagree with http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Wycliffe that Wycliffe's introduction to the Bible was the source of the Gettysburg quote. â Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.74.77.178 ( talk) 05:16, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
The section "A brief summary of the debate" is taken directly from
http://www.constitution.org/hwdebate/hwdebate.htm#A%20Brief%20Summary%20of%20the%20Debate
The copyright text on the page is "by Hal Morris - Copyright 1996. May be copied, but not in any way sold without the author's permission."
If this means that the text should be removed from this page, then let that be done. I do not know whether that warrants removal.
I will link to this page as a reference, whether it is removed or not. Rychach 00:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
The article relies too much on âSchoulerâs analysis,â a long excerpt from a work published in 1891. Some anonymous editors have âimprovedâ the text, so it no longer works as a direct quote of the material. The edits cannot be automatically undone. â âob C. alias ALAROB 14:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
What a letdown! An article about "the most eloquent speech ever made to Congress", yet we don't see it here at all. If there is no surviving transcript, the reader should be told up front and not left to wonder. âThe preceding unsigned comment was added by PJ6 ( talk ⢠contribs) 12:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC).
This reads like a cliff's note. Not an article.
This does not even include the positions of Webster and Hayne. I have to say, it has almost no information. â Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.47.95.208 ( talk) 20:16, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
It would seem to disagree with http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Wycliffe that Wycliffe's introduction to the Bible was the source of the Gettysburg quote. â Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.74.77.178 ( talk) 05:16, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
The section "A brief summary of the debate" is taken directly from
http://www.constitution.org/hwdebate/hwdebate.htm#A%20Brief%20Summary%20of%20the%20Debate
The copyright text on the page is "by Hal Morris - Copyright 1996. May be copied, but not in any way sold without the author's permission."
If this means that the text should be removed from this page, then let that be done. I do not know whether that warrants removal.
I will link to this page as a reference, whether it is removed or not. Rychach 00:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
The article relies too much on âSchoulerâs analysis,â a long excerpt from a work published in 1891. Some anonymous editors have âimprovedâ the text, so it no longer works as a direct quote of the material. The edits cannot be automatically undone. â âob C. alias ALAROB 14:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)