This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 22 April 2022, see discussion. keep, 6 August 2016, see discussion.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{ WikiProject Computer science}} Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Norway This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University College London/MSIN1003 Information World (Autumn 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

can you please add screenshot of the updated site? thx. 70.179.114.40 ( talk) 19:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC) reply

70.179.114.40 45.125.220.140 ( talk) 04:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

W3C is one of the two "See Also" links. I'm not sure why, since this isn't a W3C webpage and World Wide Web, Internet, etc would be just as relevant. It seems that W3C would only create confusion due to the similarity of the names. Dylan ( talk) 18:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Is there any reason this is notable? I think it should probably be deleted. Davidmanheim ( talk) 19:07, 25 February 2011 (UTC) reply

It's got an Alexa rank of 203 (184 in the US), which means it's an extremely popular website. It's the most common web development reference site on the Web, and is very well known. -- Jatkins ^{( talk - contribs)} 21:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC) reply

ReadWriteWeb describes it as "one of the oldest and most popular web development tutorial sites on the Web". A Google search for "W3Schools" yields over 843,000 results. I believe the subject matter meets notability guidelines, so I have removed the non-notable tag. -- Jatkins ^{( talk - contribs)} 21:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC) reply

If anyone was wondering, this site has an Alexa global ranking of 133. Just for reference, BBC.com ranks 141. In question of notability, yes, worlds 133rd most popular website is certainly notable, despite its poor contents. –  nafSadh did say 05:27, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Is it appropriate to mention that the site is the subject of some controversy? consider wwww.w3fools.com / Linguisht ( talk) 08:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC) reply

I suppose you could include a criticism section, but the "W3fools" website is not that notable, and it has received much criticism of its self. -- Jatkins ^{( talk - contribs)} 10:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC) reply

There should be some citation related to the "debatable" nature of W3Fools's claims. Adam Blomeke Adam Blomeke 13:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC) reply

I am going to remove the entire section on w3fools.com, since looking at their website today, they have more or less backed down completely. If even the notability of W3Schools is in dispute, then a section on w3fools.com seems to me to now be completely unwarranted. Acasson ( talk) 14:34, 15 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Yea, I did a good portion of the rewrite of W3Fools that is out now. We decided that bad information will be in the world regardless of efforts to stop it. Having a site up simply to point out errors in one place isn't helpful. It is best that we simply encourage developers to learn from better resources such as Web Platform Docs. This also helps stop people who don't even know what they are doing from linking to W3Fools every time they see W3Schools linked to acting like they know-it-all and are such good devs for not using/liking W3Schools. JonGarbee ( talk) 11:35, 11 October 2014 (UTC) reply

And now it's back. In the above discussion there seems is consensus that "a section on w3fools.com seems to me to now be completely unwarranted". Don't think anything's changed since then? -- Cornellier ( talk) 00:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Is anyone ( User:Masgui?) up for fixing (per above) the "Criticism" section or am I taking it out again? -- Cornellier ( talk) 03:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Google often points me to W3School. The problem with this website is it's appeal to authority (W3). If you remove this section just make it clear it's dissociated with W3 and that other resources exist like Mozilla Developer Networks https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masgui ( talk • contribs) 03:39, 15 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The article states "its name is derived from the World Wide Web, but is not affiliated with the W3C". As for writing that "other resources exist", please see WP:NOTDIR. If you're annoyed by it coming up in Google searches, then I suggest you try Personal Blocklist by Google. Just Google it. -- Cornellier ( talk) 03:51, 15 August 2016 (UTC) reply

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) -- Pooja Mistry ( talk) 20:20, 19 October 2014 (UTC) reply

hi my name is Pooja Mistry and I am editing this article as part of my coursework. I have not yet completed it and so not all views have been presented, please do not delete this article!!

Hi there - I understand that this article is contested for deletion. However, may I kindly ask that you do keep it on WP as it is quite a notable topic (see user above who mentions the site's alexa rank) - and a student is currently working on it as part of her student assignment (see: banner on top and Wiki Education Program). In the spirit of inclusionism, kindly consider this topic as part of the Encyclopaedia. Many thanks and all the best! :) -- Raya - Get in touch! 09:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Only refs are self-linked to the org itself; no news sources. 209.82.165.136 ( talk) 16:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC) reply

company name car zone and giving cars for rent with gtotal 15 cars 2409:40F2:12A:29E8:E193:16AE:37BA:D90D ( talk) 18:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply