This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Normally, I would agree with you that conservatives questioning the use of funds by liberal organizations and vice-versa would simply be normal mud-slinging. This appears to be slightly different, especially with the inclusion of an i-Pod in the item list. I don't know much about i-Pods, so it looks like an amenity for a staffer. -- Habap 02:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
User Badagnani keeps removing sourced material that is not sycophantic to the Veterans for Peace postions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Greyggrey G. Storey( talk • contribs) 02:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC).
VFP is a controversial group that elicits strong emotions. No other veteran group was mentioned as opposing VFP. If VFP was reporting on the Korean story of the time, they then need to update their findings, else the logical conclusion is that they are against the military and not national policy.
Local VFP groups have created so-called memorials that display the names and images of those who died in theater. My brother-in-law was so used by that group. His family did not approve, and he would not approve. --—Preceding unsigned comment added by Greyggrey ( talk • contribs)
I've had to tag the image of Cindy Sheehan on this page for probable copyvio. It claimed to be public domain, but gave no explanation of why. Also, I'm not really convinced by the fair use argument for the bus.
I think someone could make a good fair use claim for an image of Cindy Sheehan on this page; someone should do so. The bus picture does not look notably more relevant than the "free" picture of a Veterans for Peace bus I recently uploaded to Commons. See Commons:Category:Veterans for Peace for that and other possibly useful images. - Jmabel | Talk 23:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
We need to find some sources for some of the statements other than VFPs own website. I'm sure it shouldn't be a problem to find them, but we need to do it.... -- Habap ( talk) 17:06, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Veterans for Peace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.veteransforpeace.org/our-work/vfp-national-projects/korea-peace-campaign/html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.vn-agentorange.org/index.html/VietnamWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Veterans for Peace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:38, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
I'm finding nothing in RSes actually ... about the organisation. Literally the closest I've found is mentions of a couple of VFP protestors arrested in Ireland for property damage earlier in 2019.
Is there any actual news coverage, magazine articles, etc, in Reliable Sources? - David Gerard ( talk) 12:13, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Normally, I would agree with you that conservatives questioning the use of funds by liberal organizations and vice-versa would simply be normal mud-slinging. This appears to be slightly different, especially with the inclusion of an i-Pod in the item list. I don't know much about i-Pods, so it looks like an amenity for a staffer. -- Habap 02:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
User Badagnani keeps removing sourced material that is not sycophantic to the Veterans for Peace postions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Greyggrey G. Storey( talk • contribs) 02:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC).
VFP is a controversial group that elicits strong emotions. No other veteran group was mentioned as opposing VFP. If VFP was reporting on the Korean story of the time, they then need to update their findings, else the logical conclusion is that they are against the military and not national policy.
Local VFP groups have created so-called memorials that display the names and images of those who died in theater. My brother-in-law was so used by that group. His family did not approve, and he would not approve. --—Preceding unsigned comment added by Greyggrey ( talk • contribs)
I've had to tag the image of Cindy Sheehan on this page for probable copyvio. It claimed to be public domain, but gave no explanation of why. Also, I'm not really convinced by the fair use argument for the bus.
I think someone could make a good fair use claim for an image of Cindy Sheehan on this page; someone should do so. The bus picture does not look notably more relevant than the "free" picture of a Veterans for Peace bus I recently uploaded to Commons. See Commons:Category:Veterans for Peace for that and other possibly useful images. - Jmabel | Talk 23:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
We need to find some sources for some of the statements other than VFPs own website. I'm sure it shouldn't be a problem to find them, but we need to do it.... -- Habap ( talk) 17:06, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Veterans for Peace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.veteransforpeace.org/our-work/vfp-national-projects/korea-peace-campaign/html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.vn-agentorange.org/index.html/VietnamWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Veterans for Peace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:38, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
I'm finding nothing in RSes actually ... about the organisation. Literally the closest I've found is mentions of a couple of VFP protestors arrested in Ireland for property damage earlier in 2019.
Is there any actual news coverage, magazine articles, etc, in Reliable Sources? - David Gerard ( talk) 12:13, 30 October 2019 (UTC)