Vailuluʻu has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 7, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Vailuluʻu appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 September 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Vailulu'u. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Samoan language, which I gather produced the volcano's name, uses the ʻokina (ʻ), not an apostrophe ('). Per MOS:HAWAII the proper symbol should be used for Hawaiian toponyms, so I figure using it in Samoan toponyms would be an improvement too. I didn't move the article since it's a GAN and I don't know if it will break the templates. Daß Wölf 06:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ganesha811 ( talk · contribs) 14:15, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi! I'm opening a Good Article Nomination review. Hoping to complete the review over the next couple of days. I'll be using the template below. Thanks!
Ganesha811 (
talk) 14:15, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
This passes GAN! Very nice article. Congrats to @ Jo-Jo Eumerus: and all those who worked on it. Will do the needful to wrap up the nomination now. Ganesha811 ( talk) 16:13, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 21:50, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk). Self-nominated at 10:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC).
Vailuluʻu has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 7, 2019. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Vailuluʻu appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 September 2019 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Vailulu'u. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:58, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Samoan language, which I gather produced the volcano's name, uses the ʻokina (ʻ), not an apostrophe ('). Per MOS:HAWAII the proper symbol should be used for Hawaiian toponyms, so I figure using it in Samoan toponyms would be an improvement too. I didn't move the article since it's a GAN and I don't know if it will break the templates. Daß Wölf 06:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ganesha811 ( talk · contribs) 14:15, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi! I'm opening a Good Article Nomination review. Hoping to complete the review over the next couple of days. I'll be using the template below. Thanks!
Ganesha811 (
talk) 14:15, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |
This passes GAN! Very nice article. Congrats to @ Jo-Jo Eumerus: and all those who worked on it. Will do the needful to wrap up the nomination now. Ganesha811 ( talk) 16:13, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 21:50, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk). Self-nominated at 10:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC).