This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I surveyed the article. It only ruled out Ortiz from a Senate or gubernatorial candidacy, NOT Patrick
GameGuy95 ( talk) 23:38, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Bennett is listed in multiple reliable sources as a candidate [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], and is now supporting Winslow [7]. He should be listed as a withdrawn candidate. -- Hirolovesswords ( talk) 22:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Currently the last record of the democratic polling table shows Lynch wins 58 to 42; but the results table shows Markey wins 58 to 43. The Dorchester Reporter says it's Markey. User:Sbauman 06:07, 1 May 2013
Is there a picture of Mr. Gabriel Gomez on Wikipedia that could be posted on this article, along with his personal article? - Billybob2002 ( talk) 02:31, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Everything's been fixed. Images are now proportioned. -- yeah_93 ( talk) 00:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
After all the work on this photo, and know it's nominated for deletion? - Billybob2002 ( talk) 01:37, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Newest general election poll (from Emerson College, 2013-05-20/22 — thank you very much for promptly putting up poll results!) shows Lynch as getting 45%. I'm sure there's a missing cell so that the 45%, D+12%, and 33% just get pushed 1 to the R. But I haven't fixed it, because I don't know where the 22% is supposed to end up. Sbauman ( talk) 10:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
How is this race similar to the 2010 election? Gomez hasn't won yet and if he has another week like last week, he probably never will. Markey is running much differently than Coakley did; by all objective measure, she coasted after the primary until the last two weeks; Markey has been running hard. And here's only been one poll that has shown Gomez within striking distance of Markey. Until the election, writing it's similar to 2010 is just malarkey. 74.69.121.132 ( talk) 23:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
There are three issues in recent edits today, that might better be addressed first here on the talk page before implemented through edits to the article: 1) Chronological order of the polls; 2) including hypothetical match-ups in the non-hypothetical poll tables; and 3) the "messiness" of the tables. Can we discuss them here?— GoldRingChip 02:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Should party-funded (or party-leaning) polls be included? See, for example, http://www.mclaughlinonline.com/6?article=102.— GoldRingChip 22:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Oh and "Let's discuss changes on talk page". I left the last comment above, perhaps if you replied to me there before changing the polling table again from the one that was mutually agreed upon. Tiller54 ( talk) 22:50, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on United States Senate special election in Massachusetts, 2013. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/mass-braces-senate-race-kerry-gets-sos-nod{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://pol.moveon.org/give/markey_ed.html?bg_id=hpc5&id=65638-21626764-reu6PFx&t=2When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I surveyed the article. It only ruled out Ortiz from a Senate or gubernatorial candidacy, NOT Patrick
GameGuy95 ( talk) 23:38, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Bennett is listed in multiple reliable sources as a candidate [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], and is now supporting Winslow [7]. He should be listed as a withdrawn candidate. -- Hirolovesswords ( talk) 22:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Currently the last record of the democratic polling table shows Lynch wins 58 to 42; but the results table shows Markey wins 58 to 43. The Dorchester Reporter says it's Markey. User:Sbauman 06:07, 1 May 2013
Is there a picture of Mr. Gabriel Gomez on Wikipedia that could be posted on this article, along with his personal article? - Billybob2002 ( talk) 02:31, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Everything's been fixed. Images are now proportioned. -- yeah_93 ( talk) 00:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
After all the work on this photo, and know it's nominated for deletion? - Billybob2002 ( talk) 01:37, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Newest general election poll (from Emerson College, 2013-05-20/22 — thank you very much for promptly putting up poll results!) shows Lynch as getting 45%. I'm sure there's a missing cell so that the 45%, D+12%, and 33% just get pushed 1 to the R. But I haven't fixed it, because I don't know where the 22% is supposed to end up. Sbauman ( talk) 10:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
How is this race similar to the 2010 election? Gomez hasn't won yet and if he has another week like last week, he probably never will. Markey is running much differently than Coakley did; by all objective measure, she coasted after the primary until the last two weeks; Markey has been running hard. And here's only been one poll that has shown Gomez within striking distance of Markey. Until the election, writing it's similar to 2010 is just malarkey. 74.69.121.132 ( talk) 23:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
There are three issues in recent edits today, that might better be addressed first here on the talk page before implemented through edits to the article: 1) Chronological order of the polls; 2) including hypothetical match-ups in the non-hypothetical poll tables; and 3) the "messiness" of the tables. Can we discuss them here?— GoldRingChip 02:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Should party-funded (or party-leaning) polls be included? See, for example, http://www.mclaughlinonline.com/6?article=102.— GoldRingChip 22:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Oh and "Let's discuss changes on talk page". I left the last comment above, perhaps if you replied to me there before changing the polling table again from the one that was mutually agreed upon. Tiller54 ( talk) 22:50, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on United States Senate special election in Massachusetts, 2013. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/mass-braces-senate-race-kerry-gets-sos-nod{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://pol.moveon.org/give/markey_ed.html?bg_id=hpc5&id=65638-21626764-reu6PFx&t=2When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)