This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
United States Environmental Protection Agency article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The preview pages for the EPA page have a problem. See for example: /info/en/?search=Chevrolet_Volt I don't know how to investigate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.220.15.57 ( talk) 16:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
I don't see any mention or reference to the EPA's "One Cleanup Program" of which I have found reports and information on. First on what I believe is a local FOIA site, and second on the EPA site archives.
There are multiple elements of notability in my belief, for example
-In relation to the York PA Article, as a site there is the first in the US to volunteer and enroll in the program
-Possibly with the Harley-Davidson Article, as that is the location of said site
-It's an EPA program, so it should at least be included in the EPA article
-Information on the "York site remedy" FOIA (?) page seems very thorough and complete, including reports and maps.
These two pages by themselves could possibly be used as a basis for expanding multiple articles or creating an article/articles.
So far, all I have done is include this program in the EPA article under the programs list. Darwulf ( talk) 23:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
The "Programs" section is still missing many basic summaries of EPA's major programs, despite this section being tagged as such ten years ago. I will add a basic structure for the section:
I will add some descriptions for the individual core programs where I can, but I will need help from the many knowledgeable folks out there. Please help by adding concise descriptions with references. Currently we have a bunch of descriptions for many "additional" programs, but we need descriptions for many of the core components, particularly the Clean Air Act programs. There is good material in the articles for the various statutes, that can be used to develop brief summaries. Thanks. Moreau1 ( talk) 23:08, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Just looking for consensus here. I edited this section a bit - pared down some less-relevant info, and reorganized the sub-sections. It seems more balanced now (though the language in this section could use improvement...)
Anyone second? 71.40.21.239 ( talk) 20:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2022 and 15 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Redearedslider11 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Redearedslider11 ( talk) 20:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
This wiki page looks well thought out and has great explanatory content. For a class I am reviewing pages to make sure there are no big errors and the only thing I could find was that a few of the citations are "not found", or do not pull up the proper article. There may be slight typos in the citation or loss of access to the article for further information.
Cheers! PaigeHerkemij ( talk) 01:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
I trimmed the history section to keep the focus on what the EPA did, rather than emphasize weakly connected details about personalities. Rjensen ( talk) 23:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
United States Environmental Protection Agency article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
The preview pages for the EPA page have a problem. See for example: /info/en/?search=Chevrolet_Volt I don't know how to investigate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.220.15.57 ( talk) 16:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
I don't see any mention or reference to the EPA's "One Cleanup Program" of which I have found reports and information on. First on what I believe is a local FOIA site, and second on the EPA site archives.
There are multiple elements of notability in my belief, for example
-In relation to the York PA Article, as a site there is the first in the US to volunteer and enroll in the program
-Possibly with the Harley-Davidson Article, as that is the location of said site
-It's an EPA program, so it should at least be included in the EPA article
-Information on the "York site remedy" FOIA (?) page seems very thorough and complete, including reports and maps.
These two pages by themselves could possibly be used as a basis for expanding multiple articles or creating an article/articles.
So far, all I have done is include this program in the EPA article under the programs list. Darwulf ( talk) 23:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
The "Programs" section is still missing many basic summaries of EPA's major programs, despite this section being tagged as such ten years ago. I will add a basic structure for the section:
I will add some descriptions for the individual core programs where I can, but I will need help from the many knowledgeable folks out there. Please help by adding concise descriptions with references. Currently we have a bunch of descriptions for many "additional" programs, but we need descriptions for many of the core components, particularly the Clean Air Act programs. There is good material in the articles for the various statutes, that can be used to develop brief summaries. Thanks. Moreau1 ( talk) 23:08, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Just looking for consensus here. I edited this section a bit - pared down some less-relevant info, and reorganized the sub-sections. It seems more balanced now (though the language in this section could use improvement...)
Anyone second? 71.40.21.239 ( talk) 20:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2022 and 15 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Redearedslider11 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Redearedslider11 ( talk) 20:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
This wiki page looks well thought out and has great explanatory content. For a class I am reviewing pages to make sure there are no big errors and the only thing I could find was that a few of the citations are "not found", or do not pull up the proper article. There may be slight typos in the citation or loss of access to the article for further information.
Cheers! PaigeHerkemij ( talk) 01:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
I trimmed the history section to keep the focus on what the EPA did, rather than emphasize weakly connected details about personalities. Rjensen ( talk) 23:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)