The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: PizzaKing13 ( talk · contribs) 17:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
I'll review this article.
PizzaKing13
¡Hablame! 17:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Comments
- Is there no free image of the Tu-91 or a schematic of its design that you could find?
- No, but I've added a non-free image
- Source for the Nato reporting name Boot?
- "It called for building a large number of warships" → "The expansion called for building a large number of warships" to disambiguate between Stalin and the expansion
- "It first flew on 17 May 1955" → "The Tu-91 first flew on 17 May 1955"
- "Khrushchev replied that" remove "that"
- Do we know what happened to the 2 prototypes after the project was canceled?
- Presumably scrapped, but nothing definitive
- "consisted on manually tabbed ailerons" → "consisted of manually tabbed ailerons"
- @ Sturmvogel 66: I've left some comments for the review. PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 18:11, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, see if my changes are satisfactory.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 08:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Everything looks good now. PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 08:27, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a. (
reference section):
- b. (citations to
reliable sources):
- c. (
OR):
- d. (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- a. (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (
major aspects):
- b. (
focused):
- a. (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales):
- b. (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: PizzaKing13 ( talk · contribs) 17:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
I'll review this article.
PizzaKing13
¡Hablame! 17:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Comments
- Is there no free image of the Tu-91 or a schematic of its design that you could find?
- No, but I've added a non-free image
- Source for the Nato reporting name Boot?
- "It called for building a large number of warships" → "The expansion called for building a large number of warships" to disambiguate between Stalin and the expansion
- "It first flew on 17 May 1955" → "The Tu-91 first flew on 17 May 1955"
- "Khrushchev replied that" remove "that"
- Do we know what happened to the 2 prototypes after the project was canceled?
- Presumably scrapped, but nothing definitive
- "consisted on manually tabbed ailerons" → "consisted of manually tabbed ailerons"
- @ Sturmvogel 66: I've left some comments for the review. PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 18:11, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, see if my changes are satisfactory.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 08:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Everything looks good now. PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 08:27, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a. (
reference section):
- b. (citations to
reliable sources):
- c. (
OR):
- d. (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- a. (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (
major aspects):
- b. (
focused):
- a. (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales):
- b. (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)