| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tropical Storm Dolores (2021) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Tropical Storm Dolores (2021) has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 15, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
- Copyedit full article
Done Search for impact image on Commons- Re-organize Prep and Impact section Done
- Add categories like "Hurricanes in Colima" Done
- Make sure all news sources follow the same format Done
- Add sources from
Milenio Done
- Flip all conversion templates to metric-first Done
- Copyedit again after all of the above is complete Done
Jay Tee⛈️ 00:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Dolores (2021)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: JayTee32 ( talk · contribs) 19:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Tails Wx ( talk · contribs) 16:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Starting review on this tropical cyclone! Pretty interesting fact that this tropical storm was linked to
another tropical cyclone in a separate basin! This'll take up to a week. Thanks! :) ~
Tails
Wx (
🐾,
me!) 16:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- Looks mostly great, especially the lead section! A few spots where it could be corrected, though.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it
verifiable with no original research, as shown by a
source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains
no original research:
- D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- Is it
neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- No unstability issues as of now!
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images?
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
Good work on this work, JayTee32! I have a few comments below so far:
Prose
- In lead: "
At least three people died in Mexico due to the storm
" – "died" to "were killed", no?
- Under
Meteorological history: "
Simultaneously, a closed surface circulation developed, signaling the development...
" – how about "signaling" to "which signaled"? - In the same section: "
with the mountainous terrain of the area
" – "of" to "in", possibly? - In
Preparations and impact: "
198 shelters were opened in 35 municipalities across the state of Jalisco prior to Dolores moving through the area
" – re-write the sentence or write "198" out in words; it shouldn't start with a numeral. - Same thing in the same section: "
35 houses across Guerrero were damaged by landslides resulting from Dolores' precursor
" - "
The worst damage Oaxaca occurred in the Sierra Sur and Costa regions, where debri was strewn across roads and extensive mudslides rendered many streets impassable
" – a bit of spelling and grammar mistakes here; "in" between "damage" and "Oaxaca", isn't it "debris"?
Spotchecks
Several spotchecks were made; a few comments below!
- Reference 10: I tried – argh, paywalled! I'll assume good faith and assume that it verifies the provided content.
- Reference 15: Dallas News does state that heavy rain occurred in the Oaxaca, Guerrero, and Michoacán – but not on the coasts.
- Reference 16: La Razón de México source does not mention the "precursor" of Dolores caused it, neither the landslides causing the damage to 35 homes!
- Reference 25: Can you remove "origin-" from the url? It's leading me to a non-private connection website and not the proper news website, and when removing that part from the url it leads me to the proper news website. The proper news website also verifies the power outages and the areas impacted, though!
No other concerns! Feel free to ping when you're finished addressing my comments above, or for any questions or comments! :) ~ Tails Wx ( 🐾, me!) 02:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- GA-Class Weather articles
- Low-importance Weather articles
- GA-Class Tropical cyclone articles
- Low-importance Tropical cyclone articles
- WikiProject Tropical cyclones articles
- GA-Class Pacific hurricane articles
- Low-importance Pacific hurricane articles
- WikiProject Weather articles
- GA-Class Mexico articles
- Low-importance Mexico articles
- WikiProject Mexico articles
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tropical Storm Dolores (2021) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| Tropical Storm Dolores (2021) has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 15, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
- Copyedit full article Done
Search for impact image on Commons- Re-organize Prep and Impact section Done
- Add categories like "Hurricanes in Colima" Done
- Make sure all news sources follow the same format Done
- Add sources from
Milenio Done
- Flip all conversion templates to metric-first Done
- Copyedit again after all of the above is complete Done
Jay Tee⛈️ 00:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Dolores (2021)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: JayTee32 ( talk · contribs) 19:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Tails Wx ( talk · contribs) 16:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Starting review on this tropical cyclone! Pretty interesting fact that this tropical storm was linked to
another tropical cyclone in a separate basin! This'll take up to a week. Thanks! :) ~
Tails
Wx (
🐾,
me!) 16:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
list incorporation:
- Looks mostly great, especially the lead section! A few spots where it could be corrected, though.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it
verifiable with no original research, as shown by a
source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains
no original research:
- D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style):
- A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
- Is it
neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- No unstability issues as of now!
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images?
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
Good work on this work, JayTee32! I have a few comments below so far:
Prose
- In lead: "
At least three people died in Mexico due to the storm
" – "died" to "were killed", no?
- Under
Meteorological history: "
Simultaneously, a closed surface circulation developed, signaling the development...
" – how about "signaling" to "which signaled"? - In the same section: "
with the mountainous terrain of the area
" – "of" to "in", possibly? - In
Preparations and impact: "
198 shelters were opened in 35 municipalities across the state of Jalisco prior to Dolores moving through the area
" – re-write the sentence or write "198" out in words; it shouldn't start with a numeral. - Same thing in the same section: "
35 houses across Guerrero were damaged by landslides resulting from Dolores' precursor
" - "
The worst damage Oaxaca occurred in the Sierra Sur and Costa regions, where debri was strewn across roads and extensive mudslides rendered many streets impassable
" – a bit of spelling and grammar mistakes here; "in" between "damage" and "Oaxaca", isn't it "debris"?
Spotchecks
Several spotchecks were made; a few comments below!
- Reference 10: I tried – argh, paywalled! I'll assume good faith and assume that it verifies the provided content.
- Reference 15: Dallas News does state that heavy rain occurred in the Oaxaca, Guerrero, and Michoacán – but not on the coasts.
- Reference 16: La Razón de México source does not mention the "precursor" of Dolores caused it, neither the landslides causing the damage to 35 homes!
- Reference 25: Can you remove "origin-" from the url? It's leading me to a non-private connection website and not the proper news website, and when removing that part from the url it leads me to the proper news website. The proper news website also verifies the power outages and the areas impacted, though!
No other concerns! Feel free to ping when you're finished addressing my comments above, or for any questions or comments! :) ~ Tails Wx ( 🐾, me!) 02:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- GA-Class Weather articles
- Low-importance Weather articles
- GA-Class Tropical cyclone articles
- Low-importance Tropical cyclone articles
- WikiProject Tropical cyclones articles
- GA-Class Pacific hurricane articles
- Low-importance Pacific hurricane articles
- WikiProject Weather articles
- GA-Class Mexico articles
- Low-importance Mexico articles
- WikiProject Mexico articles