GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Philroc ( talk · contribs) 20:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
I will need a second opinion on this article because in the references section, all the references are reliable sources expect one, which is a Internet post. I don't whether to let that through or not.
Philroc (
talk) 17:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
{{
cn}}
tags and correct
the lead. Recruitee, you are requested to check out
the GA review script and perform the checks accordingly. I noticed that you missed the first and most important part of MoS i.e. the lead. --
Ankit Maity «
T §
C»
«Review Me» 12:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
By that, I refer to the GA review that I am gonna do, so that you can see the closest details. It's a compulsory GARC step. It was supposed to be done before but sadly you went and did this review. Still, you seem to be on the right track. -- Ankit Maity « T § C» «Review Me» 14:23, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi
Ankit Maity and
Philroc, thanks for reviewing the article. Given the terse grading above and the extended exchange in which I gather something wasn't done correctly, I am bit unsure as to the next steps. My understanding is that for the article to regain GA status, the following would need to be addressed:
It seems like there might be other issues, but I cannot tell for sure. Do you have any further comments or helpful advice? Thanks, -- Mark viking ( talk) 01:46, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Philroc ( talk · contribs) 20:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
I will need a second opinion on this article because in the references section, all the references are reliable sources expect one, which is a Internet post. I don't whether to let that through or not.
Philroc (
talk) 17:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
{{
cn}}
tags and correct
the lead. Recruitee, you are requested to check out
the GA review script and perform the checks accordingly. I noticed that you missed the first and most important part of MoS i.e. the lead. --
Ankit Maity «
T §
C»
«Review Me» 12:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
By that, I refer to the GA review that I am gonna do, so that you can see the closest details. It's a compulsory GARC step. It was supposed to be done before but sadly you went and did this review. Still, you seem to be on the right track. -- Ankit Maity « T § C» «Review Me» 14:23, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi
Ankit Maity and
Philroc, thanks for reviewing the article. Given the terse grading above and the extended exchange in which I gather something wasn't done correctly, I am bit unsure as to the next steps. My understanding is that for the article to regain GA status, the following would need to be addressed:
It seems like there might be other issues, but I cannot tell for sure. Do you have any further comments or helpful advice? Thanks, -- Mark viking ( talk) 01:46, 26 February 2014 (UTC)