Tolerate It has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 9, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Riley1012 ( talk · contribs) 01:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
I will take a look at this by the end of this week. - Riley1012 ( talk) 01:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
1. Well-written
No noticeable grammar or spelling mistakes and the prose is clear and concise. No MoS issues.
2. Verifiable
Earwig's Copyvio check is fine- the similarities highlighted here are just quoted lyrics. Sources are all reliable.
3. Broad
The article is broad and focused.
4. Neutral
The article is neutral- the song's positive reception is all defended by sources, and the article also points to some criticism of the song.
5. Stable
This article is stable.
6. Illustrated
The image in the article is free and has a relevant caption. Media is fair use.
@ Gained: Well done! This article is almost ready for promotion. - Riley1012 ( talk) 18:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Tolerate It has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 9, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Riley1012 ( talk · contribs) 01:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
I will take a look at this by the end of this week. - Riley1012 ( talk) 01:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
1. Well-written
No noticeable grammar or spelling mistakes and the prose is clear and concise. No MoS issues.
2. Verifiable
Earwig's Copyvio check is fine- the similarities highlighted here are just quoted lyrics. Sources are all reliable.
3. Broad
The article is broad and focused.
4. Neutral
The article is neutral- the song's positive reception is all defended by sources, and the article also points to some criticism of the song.
5. Stable
This article is stable.
6. Illustrated
The image in the article is free and has a relevant caption. Media is fair use.
@ Gained: Well done! This article is almost ready for promotion. - Riley1012 ( talk) 18:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)