Third Amendment to the United States Constitution has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 26, 2013. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
The 23:14, 8 February 2011 Some jerk on the Internet version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to expand a stub-- Wing ( talk) 13:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
The lead of the article says "private homes". The text of the Constitution says "any house". Is there a Supreme Court ruling which uses the term "private home"? I could interpret "any house" far more widely (apartment house, warehouse, outhouse, opera house). There may be a fair housing ruling from the 1960s that has such a limit, but I would like a cite. Randall Bart Talk 03:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Seriously, this is getting extremely stupid. Certain Wikipedia editors are using the {{citation needed}} as a crutch rather than actually finding sources to cite. It's getting ridiculous. Anyone able to access this site is able to look up a good source for the two {{citation needed}}s in the middle of the article. I'm going to time how long it takes for me to find the citations. I'm starting at 11:15AM. -- 68.230.167.244 ( talk) 15:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Can we add a 'see also' to reference the Quartering Acts or Quartering in Time of War for historical context?Z 192.122.237.11 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC).
Done-- JayJasper ( talk) 19:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
https://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/03/59061.htm http://minutemennews.com/2013/07/police-seize-home-arrest-owners-to-gain-tactical-advantage-investigating-neighbors/ Are you ready for IPv6? ( talk) 03:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I'll probably try in the coming weeks to bring this article to Good Article status. I thought I'd start by asking here if any longtime editors of this article have input--any changes you particularly want to see? Thanks to all who have worked on this one before me. -- Khazar2 ( talk) 10:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Wehwalt ( talk · contribs) 23:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC) I've looked it over. A few comments, but generally this seems to meet the grade:
Let me know if you think these edits cover the points above, and thanks for all the solid suggestions. -- Khazar2 ( talk) 01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is ongoing about the lead to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution article. Please help form a consensus at Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution#Proposal for lead.-- Mark Miller ( talk) 13:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
It appears that at some point in the history of periodic vandalism of this article, some images were lost when the vandalism was reverted. I have restored them while keeping the vandalism removed. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
I registered an account here because I noticed this, so I can't really fix it since the article seems to be only editable by users who are 'automatically confirmed':
The section "Judicial Interpretation" seems to be suffering from a good deal of copy/paste artifacts. These include:
Note that paragraph 3 contains unique information and probably should not be deleted. Asattely ( talk) 11:05, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the 'Judicial interpretation' section, the first and second (incomplete) paragraphs are repeated after the 3rd paragraph, although the 2nd is apparently completed there.
Naterade21 ( talk) 06:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Amendment III
"No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house (property), without the consent of the owner (property rights), nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
Narrowest interpretation only mentions soldiers. Slightly (1 degree) broader interpretation (annotated) shows it to be about property rights. It can not be denied property rights does exists.
Owners right's can not be superceded, not even in time of war (national emergency), except in a manner prescribed by law (only in times of national emergency).
73.118.175.67 ( talk) Tae Hyun Song 73.118.175.67 ( talk) 20:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Third Amendment to the United States Constitution has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 26, 2013. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
The 23:14, 8 February 2011 Some jerk on the Internet version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to expand a stub-- Wing ( talk) 13:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
The lead of the article says "private homes". The text of the Constitution says "any house". Is there a Supreme Court ruling which uses the term "private home"? I could interpret "any house" far more widely (apartment house, warehouse, outhouse, opera house). There may be a fair housing ruling from the 1960s that has such a limit, but I would like a cite. Randall Bart Talk 03:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Seriously, this is getting extremely stupid. Certain Wikipedia editors are using the {{citation needed}} as a crutch rather than actually finding sources to cite. It's getting ridiculous. Anyone able to access this site is able to look up a good source for the two {{citation needed}}s in the middle of the article. I'm going to time how long it takes for me to find the citations. I'm starting at 11:15AM. -- 68.230.167.244 ( talk) 15:15, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Can we add a 'see also' to reference the Quartering Acts or Quartering in Time of War for historical context?Z 192.122.237.11 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC).
Done-- JayJasper ( talk) 19:45, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
https://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/03/59061.htm http://minutemennews.com/2013/07/police-seize-home-arrest-owners-to-gain-tactical-advantage-investigating-neighbors/ Are you ready for IPv6? ( talk) 03:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
I'll probably try in the coming weeks to bring this article to Good Article status. I thought I'd start by asking here if any longtime editors of this article have input--any changes you particularly want to see? Thanks to all who have worked on this one before me. -- Khazar2 ( talk) 10:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Wehwalt ( talk · contribs) 23:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC) I've looked it over. A few comments, but generally this seems to meet the grade:
Let me know if you think these edits cover the points above, and thanks for all the solid suggestions. -- Khazar2 ( talk) 01:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is ongoing about the lead to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution article. Please help form a consensus at Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution#Proposal for lead.-- Mark Miller ( talk) 13:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
It appears that at some point in the history of periodic vandalism of this article, some images were lost when the vandalism was reverted. I have restored them while keeping the vandalism removed. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
I registered an account here because I noticed this, so I can't really fix it since the article seems to be only editable by users who are 'automatically confirmed':
The section "Judicial Interpretation" seems to be suffering from a good deal of copy/paste artifacts. These include:
Note that paragraph 3 contains unique information and probably should not be deleted. Asattely ( talk) 11:05, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the 'Judicial interpretation' section, the first and second (incomplete) paragraphs are repeated after the 3rd paragraph, although the 2nd is apparently completed there.
Naterade21 ( talk) 06:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Amendment III
"No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house (property), without the consent of the owner (property rights), nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
Narrowest interpretation only mentions soldiers. Slightly (1 degree) broader interpretation (annotated) shows it to be about property rights. It can not be denied property rights does exists.
Owners right's can not be superceded, not even in time of war (national emergency), except in a manner prescribed by law (only in times of national emergency).
73.118.175.67 ( talk) Tae Hyun Song 73.118.175.67 ( talk) 20:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)