Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 ( talk · contribs) 00:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Review

• No dablinks

Lead

• Okay

Plot

• Delinked "pueblo".
• "Anasazi pueblo" >> "Anasazi"

Writing

• "wrote the epsiode" >> "wrote the episode"
• Extended the caption for the image.
• "In addition, it should be noted that in the" >> "In addition, the" (and some other arrangements)

Casting

• A minor fix.

Filming

• Okay

Reception

• Okay

References

• Okay

Well, all good. Minor fixes were solved. I'm passing the article. — Hahc 21 01:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Verdict

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

— Hahc 21 01:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply