The Structure of Literature is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article will appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 7, 2024.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 24, 2023 Good article nominee Listed February 28, 2024 Featured article candidate Promoted
Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles Literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chicago Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Note to self: Replace current cover with the black hardcover (1954). I think the current version is the paperback cover. czar 01:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Structure of Literature/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun ( talk · contribs) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply

• Will do. AryKun ( talk) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• Literary criticism truly sounds like the type of topic that is the life of a party.
• "The published version of his doctoral dissertation in the humanities, Goodman" Implies that Goodman is the published dissertation.
• "made in a 1934 article on aesthetics by the author" maybe better as "made by the author in a 1934 article on aesthetics"
• "Goodman's mentor" Mentors, since there's two of them?
• "known as the "Chicago School" and affiliated with Richard McKeon and R. S. Crane" The second part of that clause seems grammatically incorrect.
• Langrum, Robert (June 14, 1954). "No Final Vision". The New Republic. Vol. 130. pp. 25–26. Is not cited.
• James, Mertice M.; Brown, Dorothy, eds. (1955). Goodman, Paul. Structure of literature. p. 365. Has a formatting error.
• Spot-checks:
  • Rodway, A. E. (1955). "A Critical Technocrat". Essays in Criticism. 5 (1): 55–63. Verifies all claims made.
• That's all I have. AryKun ( talk) 15:41, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the review! I kept "article on aesthetics by the author" so that the following "who" clause refers to Goodman and not aesthetics. "Goodman's mentor" refers to just McKeon, hence that order. And I've edited the rest. Thanks again. czar 12:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC) reply