This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Much to my dismay, this article has once again been lifted nearly verbatim from the newspaper's about page. [1] I rewrote Stanford Daily back in January to replace the copyright-violating text, but here it is again. Can we at least come up with an original way to say all this? – Minh Nguyễn ( talk, contribs) 17:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
I corrected mistakes in the history section (about the origins of the Supreme Court case) and added two sentences about the Daily journalism that had the biggest impact: the bookstore investigation. Also made small fixes to alumni section. Everything is based on cites to reputable sources. Felicitybarr ( talk)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
The Stanford Daily. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
The archives website was redesigned in 2019:
https://archives.stanforddaily.com/acknowledgements
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Much to my dismay, this article has once again been lifted nearly verbatim from the newspaper's about page. [1] I rewrote Stanford Daily back in January to replace the copyright-violating text, but here it is again. Can we at least come up with an original way to say all this? – Minh Nguyễn ( talk, contribs) 17:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
I corrected mistakes in the history section (about the origins of the Supreme Court case) and added two sentences about the Daily journalism that had the biggest impact: the bookstore investigation. Also made small fixes to alumni section. Everything is based on cites to reputable sources. Felicitybarr ( talk)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
The Stanford Daily. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
The archives website was redesigned in 2019:
https://archives.stanforddaily.com/acknowledgements