This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: Short story / Sci-fi Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Short story task force. This article is supported by Science fiction task force. Literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This section is in reference to an early proposed deletion by User:LFaraone on 14:53, 28 January 2007 [1], before the article was much expanded. — Lowellian ( reply) 22:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The article was created to replace the external link from RahXephon. That is all I have to say. I haven't read the story so I don't know more about the spoiler. I am not a regular editor, much less of RahXephon. I think of creation of this article as Wikignomic stuff.

Also, from my understanding, notability is not a criteria, importance is. And I strongly believe that Wikipedia should include an internal link instead of external link from an article. -- æn↓þæµß¶- ŧ- ¢ 20:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC) reply

I am not the creator of this article (Anupamsr was), but I am inclined to agree with Anupamsr that the article should not be deleted. The short story is notable. I have expanded the article somewhat. — Lowellian ( reply) 00:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC) reply