| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Church of Scientology (Melton) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Catherine Ritchie in Library Journal called it a brief, well-balanced guide to the controversial movement, and a good choice for public libraries.[2] Jana Riess in Publishers Weekly said it was a rare, welcome impartial treatment of the subject by an outsider and that it did an admirable job covering the bases and showing the views of both the Church and its detractors. [3]
Are these direct quotes - or paraphrasing from the sources? This is not clear. Cirt ( talk) 21:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Church of Scientology (Melton) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Catherine Ritchie in Library Journal called it a brief, well-balanced guide to the controversial movement, and a good choice for public libraries.[2] Jana Riess in Publishers Weekly said it was a rare, welcome impartial treatment of the subject by an outsider and that it did an admirable job covering the bases and showing the views of both the Church and its detractors. [3]
Are these direct quotes - or paraphrasing from the sources? This is not clear. Cirt ( talk) 21:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)