This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 300 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Reversions involving use of
excessive citations:. Currently applicable to "Career", "2021 lawsuit", "Libs of Tim Tok" and "Coverage of the Depp v. Heard trial" subsections.
Copying from a source acknowledged in a poorly placed citation
Inserting a text—copied word-for-word, or closely paraphrased with very few changes—then citing the source somewhere in the article, but not directly after the sentence or passage that was copied.
1A. Jacob claims in the lawsuit that the article contained "numerous false and disparaging statements" about her and her business, including the accusation that she leaked nude images of one of her clients and hiked up the rent on her "content house" tenants.
1B. Jacob says the article contained “numerous false and disparaging statements” about her and her business, including the accusation that she leaked nude images of one of her clients and hiked up the rent on her content house tenants. [1]
References
Massive multiple year guesstimate as to her birth year combined with a purposely limited early life section. What's up with that? 2600:6C56:5A3F:D8BC:D865:B924:73B5:C129 ( talk) 00:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Various ages for Lorenz may reflect different reference frames. JohndanR ( talk) 20:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Birth date 21 october 1984 Source Information Ancestry.com. U.S., Public Records Index, 1950-1993, Volume 2 [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010.
Original data: Voter Registration Lists, Public Record Filings, Historical Residential Records, and Other Household Database Listings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.123.121 ( talk) 22:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
"Taylor Lorenz was born to mega rich developer Walter R. Lorenz (65) and Anne Lorenz (67) & raised in a $5.7 million dollar mansion. Her sister is Brook Lorenz of CNN." https://www.sgtreport.com/2022/10/this-thread-is-fascinating-modern-journalists-come-almost-exclusively-being-from-mega-rich-families-taylor-lorenz-and-others-exposed/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.141.86 ( talk) 21:44, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
The article intro mentions "known for internet culture" but does not cite a reference. Also should we add the doxing issue to the intro since it is extensively referenced in the article ? That incident is how many people first heard of her and her work. Frackeroni ( talk) 16:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
This article has a specified birth year for Lorenz (1984), but this does not have a citation (there is no age range in this spot). Additionally, there's discussion here at Talk about the age range presented in the article (in the infobox), and both the infobox and the date at the beginning of the article have an attached note that provides the rationale for the range (but not the year). Is it common practice to provide a specified year when it is not known? -- Pinchme123 ( talk) 03:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
one "most likely" date, but that's no reason to pick a random year in the range if we're still saying circa. Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 20:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Closed with a consensus to include all birth dates for which a reliable source exists, noting discrepancies." (bold in original) And "...
no consensus to include only one "most likely" date or to choose a date from one of two or more reliable sources, no consensus to leave the information out entirely if conflicting dates have actually been reported in reliable sources, and no consensus to attempt WP:OR to extrapolate the date of birth ourselves." Given this, I now think we should go back to the whole date range, rather than one specified year. So something like "c. 1984-1987", in both the opening paragraph and the infobox. And of course leave the note in place to explain the range. -- Pinchme123 ( talk) 18:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 300 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Reversions involving use of
excessive citations:. Currently applicable to "Career", "2021 lawsuit", "Libs of Tim Tok" and "Coverage of the Depp v. Heard trial" subsections.
Copying from a source acknowledged in a poorly placed citation
Inserting a text—copied word-for-word, or closely paraphrased with very few changes—then citing the source somewhere in the article, but not directly after the sentence or passage that was copied.
1A. Jacob claims in the lawsuit that the article contained "numerous false and disparaging statements" about her and her business, including the accusation that she leaked nude images of one of her clients and hiked up the rent on her "content house" tenants.
1B. Jacob says the article contained “numerous false and disparaging statements” about her and her business, including the accusation that she leaked nude images of one of her clients and hiked up the rent on her content house tenants. [1]
References
Massive multiple year guesstimate as to her birth year combined with a purposely limited early life section. What's up with that? 2600:6C56:5A3F:D8BC:D865:B924:73B5:C129 ( talk) 00:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Various ages for Lorenz may reflect different reference frames. JohndanR ( talk) 20:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Birth date 21 october 1984 Source Information Ancestry.com. U.S., Public Records Index, 1950-1993, Volume 2 [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010.
Original data: Voter Registration Lists, Public Record Filings, Historical Residential Records, and Other Household Database Listings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.123.121 ( talk) 22:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
"Taylor Lorenz was born to mega rich developer Walter R. Lorenz (65) and Anne Lorenz (67) & raised in a $5.7 million dollar mansion. Her sister is Brook Lorenz of CNN." https://www.sgtreport.com/2022/10/this-thread-is-fascinating-modern-journalists-come-almost-exclusively-being-from-mega-rich-families-taylor-lorenz-and-others-exposed/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.141.86 ( talk) 21:44, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
The article intro mentions "known for internet culture" but does not cite a reference. Also should we add the doxing issue to the intro since it is extensively referenced in the article ? That incident is how many people first heard of her and her work. Frackeroni ( talk) 16:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
This article has a specified birth year for Lorenz (1984), but this does not have a citation (there is no age range in this spot). Additionally, there's discussion here at Talk about the age range presented in the article (in the infobox), and both the infobox and the date at the beginning of the article have an attached note that provides the rationale for the range (but not the year). Is it common practice to provide a specified year when it is not known? -- Pinchme123 ( talk) 03:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
one "most likely" date, but that's no reason to pick a random year in the range if we're still saying circa. Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 20:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Closed with a consensus to include all birth dates for which a reliable source exists, noting discrepancies." (bold in original) And "...
no consensus to include only one "most likely" date or to choose a date from one of two or more reliable sources, no consensus to leave the information out entirely if conflicting dates have actually been reported in reliable sources, and no consensus to attempt WP:OR to extrapolate the date of birth ourselves." Given this, I now think we should go back to the whole date range, rather than one specified year. So something like "c. 1984-1987", in both the opening paragraph and the infobox. And of course leave the note in place to explain the range. -- Pinchme123 ( talk) 18:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)