This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles United States: Indiana Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Much of this article seems to be pasted from a book from 1880 and thus is hugely out of date. The information is possibly useful historically, but the article currently doesn't inform the reader that the copy is, in fact, from 1880... needs work. Sweet kate ( talk) 15:47, 5 November 2009 (UTC) reply

To clarify why the "out of date" tag: The historical background is not outdated, but the text includes 1880's "current" info too - "This region IS catholic," etc., which was perhaps true when the text was written 130 years ago but likely not now. Sweet kate ( talk) 15:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC) reply

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Sugar Creek Township, Vigo County, Indiana's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "nris":

• From National Register of Historic Places: "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. July 9, 2010.
• From Foley Hall: "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. July 9, 2010.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 30 July 2016 (UTC) reply