This page is not a forum for general discussion about Steorn. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Steorn at the Reference desk.

	Steorn has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 20, 2006 Articles for deletion Kept January 19, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{ portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{ WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ireland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

The Steorn website now redirects to orbo.com. This site only has two products- a charger and a phone. They also list their activity as "battery technology-based products". I have updated the info box to reflect this. 69.86.6.150 ( talk) 21:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Can they really be called "products", when they're not available for purchase? Spiel496 ( talk) 00:06, 22 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Steorn/Orbo have products that are constantly arriving but never seem to arrive. In the world of marketing this is known as a teaser campaign. The laws of physics and academic research are not a teaser campaign, which is why the mainstream media has largely lost interest in Steorn/Orbo. I agree that the Wikipedia article should be wary about playing along with teaser campaigns. If "the battery is dead" (which it is according to the current main page of orbo.com) it would require a complete rewrite of the laws of thermodynamics. Steorn/Orbo has never satisfied anyone in the mainstream academic community that any of its products can do anything that would require a rewrite of the laws of physics. WP:PRIMARY and WP:REDFLAG apply in this type of situation.-- ♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 05:08, 22 March 2016 (UTC) reply

• If you go to http://orbo.com/collections/all and hover the mouse over the girl holding the device, it says "the battery is dead OCUBE - PRE-ORDER. SHIPPING IS 6 WEEKS FROM PAYMENT Regular price €1,200 Sold out", so if you wanted to order one today you couldn't anyway. If you hover over the phone, it says "the battery is dead OPHONE - PRE-ORDER. SHIPPING IS 12 WEEKS FROM PAYMENT Regular price €480 Sold out". It will be interesting to learn if anyone gets their hands on either of these devices in 2016. If you go to http://orbo.com/pages/terms-and-conditions it says "No contract exists between us and you until we notify you that we have accepted your order, we have received payment and your order has been shipped to you. We are not obliged to accept your order and we may cancel your order for any reason. If we cancel an order after you have made payment we will provide a full refund." Make of that what you will.-- ♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 06:17, 23 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Per this addition, does Frank Acland meet the "established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications" of WP:BLOGS? I'm wary of a blog entry that has somebody announcing "finally I am in a position where I think we can test on an isolated Orbo cell" a few days before April 1st, and we can't quote Acland saying in this blog post that he has confirmed "what Steorn claims happens with Orbo cells" and that "the signs are now more hopeful of confirming Steorn’s claims than I have seen to this point" per WP:SELFPUB's "exceptional claim". -- McGeddon ( talk) 08:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC) reply

It's pretty clear that E-Cat World fails WP:RS, as it is a site where people can post their own research without peer review. The claim about the Orbo battery is well into WP:EXCEPTIONAL territory, and would require more than a website that few people have ever heard of with "news, information and discussion about advanced energy technology" [1].-- ♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 09:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC) reply

@Ianmacm well the "submit a post" link you give makes it clear that the work is peer reviewed, it's just peer reviewed by the editor of the website (who's a believer in exceptional energy generation) not the academic world as a whole. With that said, far be it for me to criticize, but taking 8 weeks to test whether something needs power sounds inordinate and leaves question marks about the competence of the experimentalist. It's also uncommon for scientists to publicize the research process as well, only when the results are in. Banedon ( talk) 09:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Steorn could have given one of its devices to Eric Ash ten years ago to test it. It appears that no mainstream academic has ever managed to get their hands on one of these devices.-- ♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 09:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Steorn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060218012648/http://meta.wikimedia.org:80/wiki/Cite/Cite.php to http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cite/Cite.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC) reply

I tried to make a legitimate comment about Steorn not being investigated for investment fraud. As a scientist, I find Wikipedia to be too soft on pseudoscience. Just want you to know that you will never get a cent of support out of me. I hope that Wikipedia goes bankrupt. 92.14.41.137 ( talk) 04:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC) reply

It is not the job of Wikipedia to right great wrongs. It also has WP:BLP issues to imply fraud without very good evidence. Steorn has fizzled out without convincing anyone in the mainstream scientific community that it could produce free energy. It is silly to say things like "if you don't do this, I won't contribute to Wikipedia".-- ♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 08:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC) reply