A fact from Spokane bombing attempt appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 January 2011 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that one of the T-shirts found in a backpack bomb in Spokane referred to a play put on by high school students in Chewelah, Washington? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/January.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Explosives Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Terrorism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: FBI / Washington Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject FBI (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance). An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Could we have a date more specific than "in 2011" and "that morning"? I suppose it would be possible to chase down MLK Day and see when it was celebrated, but it would be easier if it were actually in the text.... Thanks, Cheers, Lindsay ^Hello 04:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC) reply

I inserted a dubious tag. The National Alliance is a White Separatist organization. There is no such thing as a White Supremacist organization that I know of. This is a libelous remark that can get Wikipedia sued. No such organizations that I know of want to rule over other races. They merely want to be rid of them. Trojancowboy ( talk) 00:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply

recently changed to "separatist" and removed the "dubious" tag, as the issue has been resolved. Akihironihongo ( talk) 00:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I agree, the problem is permanently fixed. I didn't want to do so myself without discussing it. Trojancowboy ( talk) 00:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hardly, as the source said supremacist - you can't change text that way. I've added two more sources that say supremacist. We go by what our sources say, not our opinions. And I've asked Trojancowboy to make it clear that when he uses the word libelous he doesn't intend legal action or to encourage legal action. Dougweller ( talk) 17:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you for adding the two sources that say supremacist. I was unsure myself, but I see now my act of submission to Trojancowboy was a mere blunder. A previous version of National Alliance (United States) mentioned the group as white separatist, and that was the reason I changed it. I apologize for my mistake. Akihironihongo ( talk) 00:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

No problem, I wouldn't lump you with Trojancowboy. We all make mistakes. Dougweller ( talk) 09:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you, I deeply appreciate your understanding. Akihironihongo ( talk) 14:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2011 Spokane bombing attempt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110909164547/http://articles.boston.com/2011-03-10/news/29343665_1_white-supremacist-day-parade-route-mark-potok to http://articles.boston.com/2011-03-10/news/29343665_1_white-supremacist-day-parade-route-mark-potok

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:47, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply

This is a heads up, not a call for immediate action. The Spokesman-Review got its details wrong. Vanguard News Network is not the "website/magazine" of National Alliance. That would be National Vanguard. I understand that we have to go with what sources say, but that source has this aspect of the facts wrong. I'd be curious to see what the KOMO article states, but it is deadlinked. I'll look for other sources. 47.151.45.97 ( talk) 03:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply