This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Airports This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the airport project. United States: North Dakota Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota (assessed as Low-importance).

Not sure what the objection is to the standard airline/destination table used on basically every airport article in the United States. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 10:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello NorthBySouthBaranof, I had given my objection in the edit summary. MOS:TABLES indicates that prose is preferred to tables. The table in the article, consisting of only two airlines and two destinations, can easily be represented in prose. This is from the Manual of Style, not the style guide at WP:AIRPORTS. — Sunnya343✈ ( háblame • my work) 00:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC) reply