A fact from Schizophrenia and tobacco smoking appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 December 2009 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that studies across 20 countries show a strong association between schizophrenia and smoking? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/December.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Psychiatry Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force (assessed as High-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: September 14 to 20, 2014 (17th)

When the main page led me to this article, my immediate first question was whether schizophrenics have similarly high rates of addiction to other addictive substances, and how rates of addiction compared across classes of addictive substances. I see no such research cited here, just a direct focus on possible reasons. Does any such research exist? Is the approach of the article a limitation of the article or of the current research? - Tenebris —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.254.156.208 ( talk) 12:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Allen MH, Debanné M, Lazignac C, Adam E, Dickinson LM, Damsa C (2011). "Effect of Nicotine Replacement Therapy on Agitation in Smokers With Schizophrenia: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study". Am J Psychiatry. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10040569. PMID  21245085. {{ cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored ( help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link) Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 21:41, 5 March 2011 (UTC) reply

In its current form ( permalink), I believe the ==Causes== section is problematic, not least because of the highly particular way it's been structured ever since the page was created in 2009 ( permalink). Surely it should follow WP:MEDRS (including WP:MEDDATE) by presenting current knowledge, rather than a long list of assorted "theories"? There also appears to be an editorial mismatch between title ("Causes") and content (posited explanations for the disproportionate smoking habits). 86.186.120.156 ( talk) 17:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC) reply

This is a robust claim - but there are many academic articles that do not use such AFFIRMATIVE language. Chose to soften the language. BeingObjective ( talk) 23:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC) reply

A case of causality - I think this article could mislead - a bunch of theories.