The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: An anonymous username, not my real name ( talk · contribs) 03:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
I will review this.
An anonymous username, not my real name (
talk) 03:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section):
b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR): d (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- a (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- a (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
There really isn't anything to complain about, not even the most minor issue. Lead is good, infobox is good, image is good, prose is good, no copyright issues, no edit wars, reliable sourcing, etc. Coverage is as broad as it could possibly be. I passed it as it is. Congratulations. An anonymous username, not my real name ( talk) 20:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: An anonymous username, not my real name ( talk · contribs) 03:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
I will review this.
An anonymous username, not my real name (
talk) 03:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR): d (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- a (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- a (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
There really isn't anything to complain about, not even the most minor issue. Lead is good, infobox is good, image is good, prose is good, no copyright issues, no edit wars, reliable sourcing, etc. Coverage is as broad as it could possibly be. I passed it as it is. Congratulations. An anonymous username, not my real name ( talk) 20:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)