This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Last I checked, LegalSounds.com was not even licensed in Russia.
http://www.songboom.com/node/114 but then again there are many postings saying otherwise (note, legalsounds.com is NOT on ROMS.ru)
U235 (
talk) 14:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)reply
2010
It seems that roms.ru does not exist... —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
88.146.45.149 (
talk) 09:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC)reply
2011
As these sites are charging 9c per track, while the going rate is much higher, it seems unlikely in the extreme that any roaylties are paid to western recording artists. Additionally, all the 'evidence' provided is from the claims made by the sites themselves - there is no independent verification. " Encyclopedic content must be verifiable." - Wikipedia statement on every page. This page frankly stinks.
Heenan73 (
talk) 12:31, 9 October 2011 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Last I checked, LegalSounds.com was not even licensed in Russia.
http://www.songboom.com/node/114 but then again there are many postings saying otherwise (note, legalsounds.com is NOT on ROMS.ru)
U235 (
talk) 14:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)reply
2010
It seems that roms.ru does not exist... —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
88.146.45.149 (
talk) 09:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC)reply
2011
As these sites are charging 9c per track, while the going rate is much higher, it seems unlikely in the extreme that any roaylties are paid to western recording artists. Additionally, all the 'evidence' provided is from the claims made by the sites themselves - there is no independent verification. " Encyclopedic content must be verifiable." - Wikipedia statement on every page. This page frankly stinks.
Heenan73 (
talk) 12:31, 9 October 2011 (UTC)reply