This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Royal Challengers Bangalore article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
A fact from Royal Challengers Bangalore appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 25 February 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,650 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi, there is a spelling mistake calling "Rising Pune Supergiants" as "Supergiant". Would like to fix that. Hurricane Huracan ( talk) 15:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Now that it's officially announced, I think the title should be changed to 'Royal Challengers Bengaluru' Cric editor ( talk) 14:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No consensus. There is a large number of !vote supporting for a move, however, most of these are grounded in the fact that there is an official name change. There are also some among these participants providing some evidence on the updated usage in recent news articles. However, as pointed out in the !oppose side, just because the name is officially changed, does not mean that the article title should be updated immediately. Additionally, per WP:NAMECHANGE, there is a need for an extensive evaluation of the sources to support the argument of the change based on common usage, not just among the major news publishers, but widespread among many English language sources. As the name change is barely shy of a month at the point of this closure, it is WP:TOOSOON, as indicated in one of the !oppose comments.
The discussion would have been closed as 'Not moved', but given the active participation of the subject in the sport, there is a possibility that the updated name may stick in a subsequent discussion. Therefore, a 'No consensus' closure (in part to allow for an unbiased close of a future discussion).
Note on those who brought up Bangalore/Bangaluru as a city name in their comments: these comments, in part or whole, are disregarded as we are to be focused on the subject here: the sports team, not the city.
Note to those who seek to open a new RM discussion, it is the norm to open a move discussion for WP:NAMECHANGE at least three-six months after the official change of the name. This is to give time for the numerous sources (beyond the major news sites) to coalesce around the new name, thereby making the new name a common name among the majority of the sources. – robertsky ( talk) 09:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Royal Challengers Bangalore →
Royal Challengers Bengaluru – The franchise has been renamed, page should be moved.
Kiilvish (
talk) 13:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.
– robertsky (
talk) 16:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
IPL also updated team profile on official website with updated name
Royal Challengers Bengaluru Abdullateefsherani ( talk) 05:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The rivalry with the Chennai super kings does not stem from the water dispute whatsoever, and is mainly related to the Kohli-Dhoni dynamic and also the two being from neighbouring states.Water has no role in this RockRida317 ( talk) 12:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
In the "Rivalries" section it says "In the second time they faced each other, Ross Taylor scored a blitzkrieg 81* off 33 balls..." blitzkrieg? really? How is that blitzkrieg with the wiki article defining it as "is a word used to describe a combined arms surprise attack using a rapid, overwhelming force concentration that may consist of armored and motorized or mechanized infantry formations; together with artillery, air assault, and close air support; with intent to break through the opponent's lines of defense, dislocate the defenders, unbalance the enemies by making it difficult to respond to the continuously changing front, and defeat them in a decisive Vernichtungsschlacht: a battle of annihilation" Please can someone change this? 86.185.18.60 ( talk) 17:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Royal Challengers Bangalore article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
A fact from Royal Challengers Bangalore appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 25 February 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,650 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi, there is a spelling mistake calling "Rising Pune Supergiants" as "Supergiant". Would like to fix that. Hurricane Huracan ( talk) 15:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Now that it's officially announced, I think the title should be changed to 'Royal Challengers Bengaluru' Cric editor ( talk) 14:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No consensus. There is a large number of !vote supporting for a move, however, most of these are grounded in the fact that there is an official name change. There are also some among these participants providing some evidence on the updated usage in recent news articles. However, as pointed out in the !oppose side, just because the name is officially changed, does not mean that the article title should be updated immediately. Additionally, per WP:NAMECHANGE, there is a need for an extensive evaluation of the sources to support the argument of the change based on common usage, not just among the major news publishers, but widespread among many English language sources. As the name change is barely shy of a month at the point of this closure, it is WP:TOOSOON, as indicated in one of the !oppose comments.
The discussion would have been closed as 'Not moved', but given the active participation of the subject in the sport, there is a possibility that the updated name may stick in a subsequent discussion. Therefore, a 'No consensus' closure (in part to allow for an unbiased close of a future discussion).
Note on those who brought up Bangalore/Bangaluru as a city name in their comments: these comments, in part or whole, are disregarded as we are to be focused on the subject here: the sports team, not the city.
Note to those who seek to open a new RM discussion, it is the norm to open a move discussion for WP:NAMECHANGE at least three-six months after the official change of the name. This is to give time for the numerous sources (beyond the major news sites) to coalesce around the new name, thereby making the new name a common name among the majority of the sources. – robertsky ( talk) 09:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Royal Challengers Bangalore →
Royal Challengers Bengaluru – The franchise has been renamed, page should be moved.
Kiilvish (
talk) 13:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.
– robertsky (
talk) 16:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
IPL also updated team profile on official website with updated name
Royal Challengers Bengaluru Abdullateefsherani ( talk) 05:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The rivalry with the Chennai super kings does not stem from the water dispute whatsoever, and is mainly related to the Kohli-Dhoni dynamic and also the two being from neighbouring states.Water has no role in this RockRida317 ( talk) 12:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
In the "Rivalries" section it says "In the second time they faced each other, Ross Taylor scored a blitzkrieg 81* off 33 balls..." blitzkrieg? really? How is that blitzkrieg with the wiki article defining it as "is a word used to describe a combined arms surprise attack using a rapid, overwhelming force concentration that may consist of armored and motorized or mechanized infantry formations; together with artillery, air assault, and close air support; with intent to break through the opponent's lines of defense, dislocate the defenders, unbalance the enemies by making it difficult to respond to the continuously changing front, and defeat them in a decisive Vernichtungsschlacht: a battle of annihilation" Please can someone change this? 86.185.18.60 ( talk) 17:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)