This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I urge those who are part of a campaign not to edit on Wikipedia. This is a conflict of interest and against the NPOV guidelines of Wikipedia. Any POV edits will be reverted by myself or other editors. Davidpdx 12:24, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
There is some work that could be done on this article. First, the section on the 2002 Governor's race can be expanded and set up as a seperate section like the 2006 race. Also there has been a lot of flap about Saxton's alledged connections with Neil Goldschmidt (whether they are true and to what extent I'm not sure). Also he has take a lot of flap about his connections with the Oregonian (the newspaper). These are just some ideas of things that can be looked into. Davidpdx 07:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
That comment was COMPLETED out of line, SIR! I deleted the “Saxton Watch,” because it is unfair to the Saxton campaign. I certainly do NOT work for him, but I am offended when people violate the NPOV agreement. This is not the first time you have been accused of being belligerent or outlandish. You certainly do not own Wikipedia, and your idle threats are inexcusable. Saxton’s opponent, Ted Kulongoski, has no such site criticizing him on Wikipedia. In fact, the “Saxton Watch” site leads right to the Democratic Party’s webpage. You have broken the NPOV and I call on you to delete the “Saxton Watch” link. Your assumptions are offensive! —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:|User:]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs) 09:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove this paragraph. It needs to remain as an archieve of the conversation that took place. Davidpdx 22:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
While I do agree the link may be unfair, it does not violate NPOV! Stop erasing it. Thank you for catching this David. If it gets erased again, please request a lock from admin. If user complies, spare her/him the name. unsigned by User:ThomasRICHARDSON
I wouldn't call a removal of a NPOV violation a "really wierd" edit. Nicktaylor137 03:41pm 7 September 2006 (PST)
I removed the following comment:
Comment was added by an anonymous coward (65.100.48.225). [ [1]]. This slander/libel is utterly ridiculous, and in violation of Wikipedia policies. Keep up the vandalism, and I'll report your IP to the Mt. Hood Community College. Kythri 21:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
This older article has few verifiable sources today. It references many dead URLs and what appear to be non-online newspaper sources. I think it's clearly a notable biography, though. QuintinK ( talk) 20:30, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I urge those who are part of a campaign not to edit on Wikipedia. This is a conflict of interest and against the NPOV guidelines of Wikipedia. Any POV edits will be reverted by myself or other editors. Davidpdx 12:24, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
There is some work that could be done on this article. First, the section on the 2002 Governor's race can be expanded and set up as a seperate section like the 2006 race. Also there has been a lot of flap about Saxton's alledged connections with Neil Goldschmidt (whether they are true and to what extent I'm not sure). Also he has take a lot of flap about his connections with the Oregonian (the newspaper). These are just some ideas of things that can be looked into. Davidpdx 07:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
That comment was COMPLETED out of line, SIR! I deleted the “Saxton Watch,” because it is unfair to the Saxton campaign. I certainly do NOT work for him, but I am offended when people violate the NPOV agreement. This is not the first time you have been accused of being belligerent or outlandish. You certainly do not own Wikipedia, and your idle threats are inexcusable. Saxton’s opponent, Ted Kulongoski, has no such site criticizing him on Wikipedia. In fact, the “Saxton Watch” site leads right to the Democratic Party’s webpage. You have broken the NPOV and I call on you to delete the “Saxton Watch” link. Your assumptions are offensive! —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:|User:]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs) 09:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove this paragraph. It needs to remain as an archieve of the conversation that took place. Davidpdx 22:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
While I do agree the link may be unfair, it does not violate NPOV! Stop erasing it. Thank you for catching this David. If it gets erased again, please request a lock from admin. If user complies, spare her/him the name. unsigned by User:ThomasRICHARDSON
I wouldn't call a removal of a NPOV violation a "really wierd" edit. Nicktaylor137 03:41pm 7 September 2006 (PST)
I removed the following comment:
Comment was added by an anonymous coward (65.100.48.225). [ [1]]. This slander/libel is utterly ridiculous, and in violation of Wikipedia policies. Keep up the vandalism, and I'll report your IP to the Mt. Hood Community College. Kythri 21:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
This older article has few verifiable sources today. It references many dead URLs and what appear to be non-online newspaper sources. I think it's clearly a notable biography, though. QuintinK ( talk) 20:30, 21 December 2022 (UTC)