Robert Brode has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 22, 2015. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Military / Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Military history / Washington Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force. This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance). History of Science Low‑importance This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Biography / North America / United States / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force North American military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force

A fact from Robert Brode appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 February 2014 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Robert Brode led the group that developed the fuses used in the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Brode.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Robert Brode/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jackyd101 ( talk · contribs) 19:16, 22 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I have reviewed this article against the Wikipedia:good article criteria and although I am not quite prepared to pass the article for GA immediately, I don't think there is a long way to go. I have listed below the principle problems which prevent this article from achieving GA status and I have also appended a list of other comments which, whilst they are not essential for GA, may help in the future development of the article.

The article now has seven days to address these issues, and should the contributors disagree with my comments then please indicate below why you disagree and suggest a solution, compromise or explanation. Further time will be granted if a concerted effort is being made to address the problems, and as long as somebody is genuinely trying to deal with the issues raised then I will not fail the article. I am aware that my standards are quite high, but I feel that an article deserves as thorough a review as possible when applying for GA and that a tough review process here is an important stepping stone to future FAC attempts. Please do not take offence at anything I have said, nothing is meant personally and maliciously and if anyone feels aggrieved then please notify me at once and I will attempt to clarify the comments in question. Finally, should anyone disagree with my review or eventual decision then please take the article to WP:GAR to allow a wider selection of editors to comment on the issues discussed here. Well done on the work so far.

Issues preventing promotion

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b ( MoS):

• Lead is too short. try and give us a few more sentences on his education, later work, 1950s pacifism etc.
  • Expanded the lead. Hawkeye7 ( talk)
• "Oxford university" should be capitalised. Incidentally, given the way Oxford alumni are categorised, it is valuable to note which college he was enrolled in - this is information is available, please include it.
  • This took some finding. It was Oriel College, Oxford. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC) reply

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

• "University of London" is an administrative organisation, not a university. Usually when its used like this University College London is meant, although Blacklett was at Birkbeck - can you confirm where he was?
  • It was Birkbeck. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC) reply
• "Brode became a professor emeritus in 1967" professor emeritus where? Berkely I assume, but say so.
  • Yes. Added. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC) reply

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

Other comments

(These comments are not essential to passing GAN)

• Just a thought rather than a suggestion, but shouldn't this be listed as a science article rather than a military one? Doesn't affect the review at all, but could go either way?

  Could go either way. I don't quite recall, but I think it was because his achievements as a physicist were overshadowed by those with the Manhattan Project. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Great work - pass!

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Robert Brode. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221214854/http://physicsnow.org/history/acap/biographies/bio.jsp?broder to http://physicsnow.org/history/acap/biographies/bio.jsp?broder

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply