From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In Popular Culture

Not sure it is appropriate to grant any form of glorification through identifying Glücks as a "possible" fictional character in a famous novel. This man was a criminal, pure and simple. Since the article section on his fictional depiction fails to cite the source of origin and appears to be mythologized conjecture - I advocate for the section to be REMOVED altogether. Moreover, even if the content does appear to be true and somebody substantiates it, this constitutes nothing more than a deserved footnote and the information should be moved into the Wiki-article on the novel.@ K.e.coffman:@ Kierzek: -- Obenritter ( talk) 19:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Its been uncited for a long time, since 2008. It was tagged more recently, with no improvement. Frankly it is trivia, to say the least. Thanks, for bringing it up. I had actually taken this article off my watch list (have to pare it down sometime), so I am glad you pinged me. Kierzek ( talk) 20:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Roger that - I am removing it accordingly. You probably noticed I did some editing of this article to improve its academic quality.-- Obenritter ( talk) 20:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Nevermind - you took it to task. :-) -- Obenritter ( talk) 20:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply

New pics

I have added new images of two key characters mentioned in the article, Hoess and Pohl, as well as a photo of the Zyklon B pellets used for murdering victims. 86.189.231.93 ( talk) 19:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Rv per WP:BRD the photos of Hoess and Pohl as they are not an improvement, nor needed. They are not of the subject of this bio article. I left the photo of Zyklon B as that one is relevant. Kierzek ( talk) 20:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Hoess and Pohl are highly relevant because they were so closely involved with the Holocaust, and they clearly improve the article which is currently devoid of illustrative information. I note that there is also much information on key Holocaust figures missing but present on the German edition. W should aim to keep up-to-date with current research, especially on the connections with action T4. 86.189.231.93 ( talk) 20:29, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply
I added two relevant photos. Kierzek ( talk) 20:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:07, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Fernando rosales

Se puede ver a Richard glucks en YouTube en un vídeo en el interrogatorio a Rudolf hoss en su juicio de nuremberg 200.84.37.8 ( talk) 19:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In Popular Culture

Not sure it is appropriate to grant any form of glorification through identifying Glücks as a "possible" fictional character in a famous novel. This man was a criminal, pure and simple. Since the article section on his fictional depiction fails to cite the source of origin and appears to be mythologized conjecture - I advocate for the section to be REMOVED altogether. Moreover, even if the content does appear to be true and somebody substantiates it, this constitutes nothing more than a deserved footnote and the information should be moved into the Wiki-article on the novel.@ K.e.coffman:@ Kierzek: -- Obenritter ( talk) 19:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Its been uncited for a long time, since 2008. It was tagged more recently, with no improvement. Frankly it is trivia, to say the least. Thanks, for bringing it up. I had actually taken this article off my watch list (have to pare it down sometime), so I am glad you pinged me. Kierzek ( talk) 20:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Roger that - I am removing it accordingly. You probably noticed I did some editing of this article to improve its academic quality.-- Obenritter ( talk) 20:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Nevermind - you took it to task. :-) -- Obenritter ( talk) 20:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply

New pics

I have added new images of two key characters mentioned in the article, Hoess and Pohl, as well as a photo of the Zyklon B pellets used for murdering victims. 86.189.231.93 ( talk) 19:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Rv per WP:BRD the photos of Hoess and Pohl as they are not an improvement, nor needed. They are not of the subject of this bio article. I left the photo of Zyklon B as that one is relevant. Kierzek ( talk) 20:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Hoess and Pohl are highly relevant because they were so closely involved with the Holocaust, and they clearly improve the article which is currently devoid of illustrative information. I note that there is also much information on key Holocaust figures missing but present on the German edition. W should aim to keep up-to-date with current research, especially on the connections with action T4. 86.189.231.93 ( talk) 20:29, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply
I added two relevant photos. Kierzek ( talk) 20:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:07, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Fernando rosales

Se puede ver a Richard glucks en YouTube en un vídeo en el interrogatorio a Rudolf hoss en su juicio de nuremberg 200.84.37.8 ( talk) 19:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook