The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Epstein.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm not a partisan, so get that out of the way. But I was not sure that the "Opinion of Obama" section was appropriate -- it really seems to have more to do with Obama than Epstein. I mean, here we have Epstein, a guy who has said a ton of things about what must be thousands of different subjects. So why (other than the ongoing election) would we focus on this one? Similarly, certainly thousands of notable people have expressed views about political candidates -- I could be wrong, but I don't see anything special about this quote. If we did keep it, we might want to limit it to "statements about Obama" or the like. It's a little dangerous to say that this is Epstein's "opinion" of the candidate -- it's something he said about him, and may or may not truly reflect his opinion. Epstein may be voting for Obama, for all we know, so defining his opinion by one quote seems an overreach. Anyways, that's why I changed it, but reverts and/or contrary views are of course welcome. -- TheOther Bob 23:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/ c 13:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Richard Allen Epstein →
Richard Epstein – No reason to list him with full middle name: the only other Richard Epstein is vastly less well known – White Whirlwind
咨 21:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Epstien's books on Antitrust ought to be included in his Bibliography. The link to his full book is provided by his publisher AEI and is included in the article. ManKnowsInfinity ( talk) 16:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The editor "White whirlwind" removed all content sourced to a New Yorker interview where Epstein elaborated on his reckless coronavirus gibberish, which influenced the Trump administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic. The content is obviously DUE, and it's hard to think of content that's more DUE than a man who influenced a White House administration's response to an enormous crisis explaining his thinking in a solid RS, such as the New Yorker. The editor removed it because the content was "far too much possibly biased coverage", which is just another way of saying that this editor personally disagrees with the content and seeks to whitewash it. It should be restored immediately. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 12:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The COVID stuff is entirely WP:UNDUE, especially for the lede. IF there is some article about the politicalization of the pandemic, then his 2-bits about how the pandemic was handled can be included. NOT NOW -- because he is as poorly/well-informed as the rest of us. He's a pundit, not a health expert. – S. Rich ( talk) 05:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment on content no users, if you have an issue with a users actions take it elsewhere. Slatersteven ( talk) 13:34, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
It does need to be covered twice. Slatersteven ( talk) 09:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
And he continues to misinform, so yes this is highly relevant. Slatersteven ( talk) 10:10, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
New to the conversation, but also seems quite relevant given that he was claiming that states like Florida and Texas were a great model for the country. This happened just three weeks ago in his monthly Las Vegas Review-Journal column. [1] 2600:8801:C000:264:2114:CFC6:271D:6999 ( talk) 04:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Epstein.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm not a partisan, so get that out of the way. But I was not sure that the "Opinion of Obama" section was appropriate -- it really seems to have more to do with Obama than Epstein. I mean, here we have Epstein, a guy who has said a ton of things about what must be thousands of different subjects. So why (other than the ongoing election) would we focus on this one? Similarly, certainly thousands of notable people have expressed views about political candidates -- I could be wrong, but I don't see anything special about this quote. If we did keep it, we might want to limit it to "statements about Obama" or the like. It's a little dangerous to say that this is Epstein's "opinion" of the candidate -- it's something he said about him, and may or may not truly reflect his opinion. Epstein may be voting for Obama, for all we know, so defining his opinion by one quote seems an overreach. Anyways, that's why I changed it, but reverts and/or contrary views are of course welcome. -- TheOther Bob 23:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/ c 13:19, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Richard Allen Epstein →
Richard Epstein – No reason to list him with full middle name: the only other Richard Epstein is vastly less well known – White Whirlwind
咨 21:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Epstien's books on Antitrust ought to be included in his Bibliography. The link to his full book is provided by his publisher AEI and is included in the article. ManKnowsInfinity ( talk) 16:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The editor "White whirlwind" removed all content sourced to a New Yorker interview where Epstein elaborated on his reckless coronavirus gibberish, which influenced the Trump administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic. The content is obviously DUE, and it's hard to think of content that's more DUE than a man who influenced a White House administration's response to an enormous crisis explaining his thinking in a solid RS, such as the New Yorker. The editor removed it because the content was "far too much possibly biased coverage", which is just another way of saying that this editor personally disagrees with the content and seeks to whitewash it. It should be restored immediately. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 12:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The COVID stuff is entirely WP:UNDUE, especially for the lede. IF there is some article about the politicalization of the pandemic, then his 2-bits about how the pandemic was handled can be included. NOT NOW -- because he is as poorly/well-informed as the rest of us. He's a pundit, not a health expert. – S. Rich ( talk) 05:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment on content no users, if you have an issue with a users actions take it elsewhere. Slatersteven ( talk) 13:34, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
It does need to be covered twice. Slatersteven ( talk) 09:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
And he continues to misinform, so yes this is highly relevant. Slatersteven ( talk) 10:10, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
New to the conversation, but also seems quite relevant given that he was claiming that states like Florida and Texas were a great model for the country. This happened just three weeks ago in his monthly Las Vegas Review-Journal column. [1] 2600:8801:C000:264:2114:CFC6:271D:6999 ( talk) 04:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)