This article was nominated for deletion on September 2, 2007. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Skepticism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Paranormal Low‑importance This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative Views Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

There's no point in describing three names, who deem him as a fringe figure. Unless, there's someone notable enough, who do not belong to his own camp of lunatics and object to such descriptions, that's mere semantics. Also, the views of his publisher about his works is UNDUE for lead. ∯WBG ^converse 09:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC) reply

And, now I note this brilliant attempt at whitewashing. Cool. ∯WBG ^converse 09:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC) reply

”Semantics” does not mean “irrelevant”. Semantics is the study of cognitive meaning, which is of paramount importance. -- ExperiencedArticleFixer ( talk) 15:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Is fringe pseudoscience pseudoscience that is not mainstream pseudoscience? 142.163.195.205 ( talk) 23:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Removed "fringe". -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 07:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC) reply

[1] Doug Weller talk 19:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Today I updated someone's Ref #38 (not mine) when I noted that it linked to "enterprisemission.com" (Hoagland's original/dead URL) rather than "...missions.com" (his newer URL with the added "s").  After doing so, I decided to take a look at his site (which I hadn't done for many months) and, to my surprise, even the newer URL is now dead, and a Google search for "Richard C. Hoagland" failed to find his site. I then determined that Internet Archive last successfully archived the site in October 2023, but its subsequent crawls did not find the site. I suggest someone more experienced than myself review his article and update all relevant links to the most recent successful Internet Archive crawl ( https://web.archive.org/web/20231018041054/https://www.enterprisemissions.com/). Thanks. 2603:9000:EB00:BA7:1D78:580C:CF75:CF51 ( talk) 20:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Update: I have deleted what was originally Citation #34, as it referred to an incorrect reference, and I then revised the article's sentence accordingly with the correct Citation.  Re: my request of yesterday, I was able to take care of everything else myself except for Reference #3, which I could not find a way to revise. Its "rich-ang.jpg" link is dead, and the correct archived page is   https://web.archive.org/web/20030202040143/https://enterprisemission.com/images/rich-ang.jpg. Please make this fix.  Thank you very much. 2603:9000:EB00:BA7:1D78:580C:CF75:CF51 ( talk) 18:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Update: I found where to make the fix for Ref. #3 and have just successfully done so. 2603:9000:EB00:BA7:8DA2:E901:8670:B11A ( talk) 14:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Regarding the above flag: "It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality."

I suggest using the photo at the bottom of Hoagland's "Enterprise Mission" website's home page ( https://web.archive.org/web/20231018041054/https://www.enterprisemissions.com/). It is flattering, and his own website once complained about a skeptical magazine article's unflattering "sketch" (no doubt created due to unfounded photo-copyright fears) rather than having used "one of the many images of Hoagland freely available on the web" (see this complaint/quote at https://web.archive.org/web/20231204184256/https://www.enterprisemissions.com/skeptik.htm). 2603:9000:EB00:BA7:1D78:580C:CF75:CF51 ( talk) 20:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply